On Wed, 5 Apr 2000, Vilius Puidokas wrote:
> hi,
> i've been folowing kickstart for a while lately..
> according to RH the bug with partitioning was fixed (or at least bug
> was closed on bugzilla), by adding --onpart. I checked installation code
> (one of the pre6.2) it doesn't look like --onp
On Wed, 5 Apr 2000, Anne POSSOZ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the redhat list where kickstart issues are discussed?
> Do we have only one? Could we get on only on that matter?
There's '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' which focuses only on this topic..
>
> We have kickstart
hi,
i've been folowing kickstart for a while lately..
according to RH the bug with partitioning was fixed (or at least bug
was closed on bugzilla), by adding --onpart. I checked installation code
(one of the pre6.2) it doesn't look like --onpart can solve this
problem:
if onPart:
Hi,
What is the redhat list where kickstart issues are discussed?
Do we have only one? Could we get on only on that matter?
We have kickstart running now for redhat 6.0 on our campus.
We want to prepare it for redhat 6.2.
Dedicated discussion on that matter would be welcome to
share all kind
Hi,
I like the kickstart tool very much - but I searched in vain
in the archive for the following problem:
- kickstart sorts the partitions according size. It starts
with the largest one. So I have to repartion afterwards to
boot the machine :-(
How can I partition in the order I put into
