Came across this on freshmeat.net:
Code-Forge IDE 2.6
C-Forge is a multi-language, multi-user integrated development
environment that provides full project management and complete
edit/compile/debug cycle support for over 30 programming languages.
Features include a GUI makefile builde
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, James Olin Oden wrote:
> - if I do a chroot things work well except for I run into
> issues with mounting mounts on top the RO filesystems (this
> appears to be needed to provide access to our source control,
> and give developers a scratch sp
I would second that motion: avoid Clearcase like the plague. I have
personal experience with it. (I was forced to use it.)
Clearcase is extraordinarily expense compared to the alternatives, and
is extraordinarily complicated as well. It appeals only to pointy-haired
bosses.
In passing , I note
> > On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, James Olin Oden wrote:
> > > The only issue with that is how well it scales. Also, I quickly did
> > > look at it and it looks like you have to provide a file per environment
> > > (i.e. representing the HD). I bet you could have that file live on a NFS
> > > mount, but
>
> On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, James Olin Oden wrote:
> > The only issue with that is how well it scales. Also, I quickly did
> > look at it and it looks like you have to provide a file per environment
> > (i.e. representing the HD). I bet you could have that file live on a NFS
> > mount, but again I
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, James Olin Oden wrote:
> > http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/
> >
> > With it, you create a series of independent virtual Linux boxes.
> >
> The only issue with that is how well it scales.
I wouldn't use it for a build environment if speed is important. :-(
There's
> >
> > Have you looked at UML (User Mode Linux)
> >
> No I haven't but that is exactly the sort of thing I was looking for.
> Not that its the perfect soultion necessarily (I still have to play
> with it), but I needed some advice from out side the box I was
> thinking in (-:
> > http://user
Have you looked at UML (User Mode Linux)
http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/
With it, you create a series of independent virtual Linux boxes.
What you load on what virtual box is up to you.
Conceptually, even kernel panics are kept isolated to their own virtual box.
I have not yet used
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, James Olin Oden wrote:
> The only issue with that is how well it scales. Also, I quickly did
> look at it and it looks like you have to provide a file per environment
> (i.e. representing the HD). I bet you could have that file live on a NFS
> mount, but again I wonder how i
>
> Have you looked at UML (User Mode Linux)
>
No I haven't but that is exactly the sort of thing I was looking for.
Not that its the perfect soultion necessarily (I still have to play
with it), but I needed some advice from out side the box I was
thinking in (-:
> http://user-mode-linux.sour
Have you looked at UML (User Mode Linux)
http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/
With it, you create a series of independent virtual Linux boxes.
What you load on what virtual box is up to you.
Conceptually, even kernel panics are kept isolated to their own virtual box.
I have not yet used
Hi All,
I have been given the task reasearching possible ways of setting
up a development environment such that:
- Multiple releases can be supported on the same machine (e.g.
the perl in the 7.3 and 7.2 on the same machine).
- Try to avoid rebuilding (and altering) the
12 matches
Mail list logo
