using both virtual cpus, tried different bioses etc.. but no worky :(
-j
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laurent GUERBY
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 12:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: "Hyperthreading"
On Tue, 2003-08-1
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 12:16, James Olin Oden wrote:
> I think 2.4.18 of the linux kernel and beyond do so, and specifically RH 9
> supports hyper threading right out of the box. I have been using it on
> some boxes supporting hyperthreading without any issues since the RH 9
> b
h a gig of main memory on
> an Intel brand mother board with integrated 1000 Base-T nic. Along the
> way, I noticed that the bios has an option to turn on or off
> "Hyperthreading" - which I presume is just a flavor of pipelining - and
> the supporting documentation warns
t; > an Intel brand mother board with integrated 1000 Base-T nic. Along the
> > way, I noticed that the bios has an option to turn on or off
> > "Hyperthreading" - which I presume is just a flavor of pipelining - and
> > the supporting documentation warns to not
h a gig of main memory on
> an Intel brand mother board with integrated 1000 Base-T nic. Along the
> way, I noticed that the bios has an option to turn on or off
> "Hyperthreading" - which I presume is just a flavor of pipelining - and
> the supporting documentation warns
I don't know about >120GB drives, however, Hyperthreading works in the
recent Red Hat released 2.4 kernels. I'm not sure if that's a back port
from 2.6 or what. What happens is the kernel sees 2*n processors where
n is the number of physical processors in the machine. I.e
se-T nic. Along the
way, I noticed that the bios has an option to turn on or off
"Hyperthreading" - which I presume is just a flavor of pipelining - and
the supporting documentation warns to not use hyperthreading if your OS
does not support it...
OK, you saw it coming a mile away: What
