On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Steve Dixon wrote:
> We switched over from a windows 2000 server for a gateway to a redhat 9
> box, all updates. I am using a firewall tool called narc. I've tried
> others but with the same effect. Before we switched over to linux we
> could connect to our mail server(loca
On 26 Mar 2003, hossein aminaiee wrote:
> Hi,
> Actually I prefer to work on redhat's kernel. But I didn't find any
> tutorial on it. And even I don't know whether it is a good start or not.
Neither do I but you might want to have a look at http://www.kernelnewbies.org
and decide for yourself.
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, Tesla 13 wrote:
> >How often did you try to download disc #2?
> >Corrupted downloads are possible.
>
> The iso works fine. Downloads are not corrupted. I had it downloaded 3
> times. Once from ftp.redhat.com, other times from .gov mirrors.
>
> >The MD5 fingerprint in the MD
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Trevor Fraser wrote:
> Hello John.
>
> We're do I go to join the Valhalla mailing list.
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/valhalla-list
--
.Tom"Nothing would please me more than being able to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] hire ten programmers and de
On 26 Jun 2002, Warren Togami wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 09:52, Craig Kelley wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Dan Hollis wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Craig Kelley wrote:
> > > > I know you're all probably aware of this by now, but a serious hole is in
> > > > all versions of OpenSSH
On 6 May 2002, Florin Andrei wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-05-06 at 11:37, Michael Best wrote:
> >
> > I just downloaded and installed the kernel-2.4.18-3.src.rpm (SRPM for
> > the kernel, instead of the kernel source) and it contains:
> >
> > linux-2.4.17-lowlatency.patch
>
> Ah, cool.
>
> > Do you
On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, John Summerfield wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > On Thu Feb 14 2002 at 05:36, John Summerfield wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > > BTW - I thought Red Hat released 7.2 for IA64 machines - so you
> > might
> > > want to look at the files there or the updated 2.4
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Matt Wilson wrote:
> Yes, we discovered that the krb5 package oddly grew this stat symbol
> in a global context in 7.0. This was a bug in the krb5 package. But
> when compiled aginast kerberos, the LPRng package used this symbol
> provided by krb5-libs instead of the glibc
On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, chris asano wrote:
> Thanks Tom.
>
> I'm looking to run server apps.
>
> Let me give an analogy. I want to run Word or Excel on
> a server. It is installed fully on the server. The
> only thing I have is a dumb terminal with a web
> browser.
If you are looking for something
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, chris asano wrote:
> Is there a Citrix like clone on linux?
>
> This would be like PC Anywhere but faster. Citrix has
> web browser plugins and a Java client that enable you
> to run Windows applications on a Citrix application
> server, but have only the thinnest necessary g
On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, Tony Nugent wrote:
> On Wed Mar 14 2001 at 15:04, chris asano wrote:
>
> > Is there a Citrix like clone on linux?
> >
> > This would be like PC Anywhere but faster. Citrix has
> > web browser plugins and a Java client that enable you
> > to run Windows applications on a Citri
On 8 Jan 2001, Anand Palaniswamy wrote:
>
> Few comments about the latest rawhide release (2001-01-03).
>
> - printtool is now gone. You should make printool a symlink to
> lprngtool.
Is this an ncurses based tool or yet another USELESS GUI thing?
--
..Tom "Do not
On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 08:55:32PM +1000, Tony Nugent wrote:
> > I know that this has been mentioned here before, but can I *beg* that
> > redhat developers seriously and urgently consider either modifying
> > printtool to allow it to work with a text/cu
On 25 Jun 2000, Harry Putnam wrote:
> I hardily concur. Its ugly, mind numbing, boring and promotes a
> mental state where suicide appears appealing. I'm considering setting
> my self on fire until such time as Redhat fixes this.
>
> Joking aside. It is ugly. This .procmailrc recipe will str
Hi all,
I was wondering why all of the sudden someone finds it necessary to
add [redhat-devel-list] to the subject of every message from this list.
Please remove this junk. It takes up half of the available subject line
so that the real subject line scrolls off of the screen. In a lot of cases
thi
Hi all,
I am having a problem with my cartman system. I cannot access tty17-24
with the right alt key. I used to be able to do it on my hedwig console
but that even stopped working (they are 2 different computers). I am not
sure where to even begin to look. As far as I can tell the keytables hav
On Wed, 24 Nov 1999, Jay Turner wrote:
> it, but the expert user would. Unfortunately we did not doa very good job of
> documenting the fact that we moved fdisk to expert mode!
>
> Sorry about that . . . we will get all of out ducks in a row for the next
> release :-)
Thanks for the response.
Hi all,
I just did my first 6.1 install and found it too winbloze like for my liking.
I realize that in order to reach the masses we need to do this BUT what
would be wrong with continuing to cater to the old timers a little also?
My biggest complaint is that I cannot easially find fdisk during th
On Fri, 22 Oct 1999, Matt Nelson wrote:
> why should i have to burn my own disk??? i paid $80 so that i wouldn't
> have to!
>
> i suspect you are correct, though. Red Hat will probably not issue new
> CD's. this is a bad move for Red Hat, however. let me ask
> three questions:
>
> 1) is Red
On Fri, 22 Oct 1999, Chuck Mead wrote:
>
>
> As the Red Hat folks are very kind and patient people they probably won't do
> this but I just cannot help myself. (Plz note that I have been in your
> shoes, but not recently ~sigh!).
>
< Lots of good stuff deleted>
>
> We *WERE* warned.
20 matches
Mail list logo
