On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Jiahan Chen wrote:
> Hi, there,
>
> I began to work on embedded linux applications with
> Red Hat Linux 7.3 and kernel-2.4.18 Release.
>
> The following problems were encountered when trying to
> rebuild new kernels:
>
> 1. Is it normal for long time to finish?
>It too
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Bill Rugolsky Jr. wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 03:26:03PM -0800, Lars Damerow wrote:
> > I read an interesting page by Richard Gooch regarding a new approach to running
> > Linux's boot scripts:
> >
> > http://www.atnf.csiro.au/people/rgooch/linux/boot-scripts/
> >
> > It
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Carlos wrote:
> Em Seg 02 Dez 2002 21:57, Peter Bowen escreveu:
> > On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 17:02, Carlos wrote:
> > > Why did you use dietlibc? Why did you not use glibc ?
> >
> > dietlibc, as the name suggests, is a lightweight libc. It generates
> > noticibly smaller static
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Viktor Vislobokov wrote:
> Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
> > By the way, you can use apt with RedHat. See:
> >
> > http://apt.freshrpms.net
> >
> > for packages and more links.
>
>Thanks, I know. But I ask, "Why RH is not use APT?",
> if APT is popular package managment
On 28 Oct 2002, Chris Tooley wrote:
> Apt has some deficiencies in it's dependency resolution. It's really
> good, but up2date came along before apt4rpm and it doesn't require a
> special repository to function, any ole ftp server will work.
Uh. Up2date certainly does NOT work with "any ole ftp-
On Thu, 25 Jul 2002, James Olin Oden wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A while back we had a discusion about how to detect the number
> of cpu's that were really on the system. The previous discussion
> was centered around hyperthreading, but I am not really concerned
> with that aspect of the problem. What I
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Robin Holt wrote:
> Robin Holt wrote:
>
> > Some of the pieces I am building and adding to my RedHat installation are
> > requiring modifications to the /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit script.
> >
> > What would be the response to creating an rc.sysinit.d, breaking the
> > rc.sysinit
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I need help getting the source code for the "pci_lookup_name(...)"
> function (found under /usr/include/pci/pci.h)
>
> Can anyone send it to me please? Or point me to a website
> where I can find it? Thanks!
>
> The reason I am askin
On Sun, 2002-03-03 at 08:57, ext Steve Fernandez wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Could somebody tell me the EASIEST way to open a 640x480 window
> under X, and then color all the pixels individually using a 16-bit color
> value? What I'm looking for is something very, very fast and like
>
> create
On Tue, 2002-02-19 at 21:31, ext Rui Barreiros wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm trying to build a custom redhat cd, so i customize the comps file,
> and run a self made perlscript to check dependencies and it creates a
> dir with all needed rpm's (usually they're about 190 mb).
>
> There are also anot
On Tue, 2002-02-05 at 05:10, ext terry barnum wrote:
> What prompted my hypothetical system question is I'm in the process
> of specing out a new file server and I thought maybe someone here
> would know if the setup would overcome the 2 gig limit I'm
> experiencing with our current server.
>
On Mon, 2002-02-04 at 04:22, ext Al Potter wrote:
>
>
> OK, then does this inply that the largest (ext2|ext3|reiserfs|$fs) filesytem
> is also 2Gb?
2.4-kernels support 64bit filesizes by default on (at least) ext[23] and
reiserfs, dunno about others. There are patches to do that on 2.2 too.
> And if I must take my system running, because it is doing some kind of
> calculation, and arrives some other user, and make a CTRL-ALT-DEL, I lose all
> my work?
By default, yes..
- Panu -
>
> Brrr
>
> I will keep my system at home tonight ;)
>
> Mario
>
On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, Mario Torre wrote:
> Matt Wilson wrote:
> > You should only be able to poweroff if you are sitting at the console,
> > or if you are logged into the console as well as accessing the machine
> > remotely. In this case, you could just reach down and hit the power
> > switch an
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, John Summerfield wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > is "rpm -e linuxconf" here.
>
> You too?
Me too :)
- Panu -
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-
On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, John Summerfield wrote:
> >
> > When you change the kernel configuration even while staying on the same
> > version it's possible (or likely, I think) that internal kernel
> > datastructures change. Some of them are more critical than others.
> >
> > If you want more detail
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Dave Ihnat wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 03:32:03PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > It'll stop the complaining for the most part but might also break your
> > kernel in interesting ways :)
>
> Explain? To the best of my knowledge, this onl
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Dave Ihnat wrote:
> On Tue Sep 26 2000 at 18:04, "Balazs Wellisch" wrote:
> > Can anyone tell me how to correct the following error:
> >
> > depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.2.16-3/misc/emu10k1.o
> >From the make menuconfig or xconfig, disable
>
> "Set versio
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Tony Nugent wrote:
> On Tue Sep 26 2000 at 18:04, "Balazs Wellisch" wrote:
>
> > Can anyone tell me how to correct the following error:
> >
> > depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.2.16-3/misc/emu10k1.o
>
> FWIW, I've seen exactly the same error using the stock
On Sun, 24 Sep 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> Has anyone RPMified Source Navigator yet? All I can find is the
> source tarballs, and since it is a Red Hat product I figured
> there would be RPM's?
Making SN rpm's has been on my todo-list from the minute I realized there
aren't any. Unfortunately
On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Jeff Pitman wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
> In particular, it gives ugly backtraces if you have a kickstart file that
> worked just fine with RedHat 6.2.
> Incompatible changes are bad enough, but these failures should be more
> graceful and give more clue what's wrong
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Frank Hale wrote:
> I downloaded the kernel-2.2.16 source rpm. I noticed a
> number of patches in there. What are these patches
> for? Are they RH specific. What would be the harm in
> just packaging the kernel source tarball by itself.
> I've never had the need to patch the k
On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Harmless Boy wrote:
> Hi all,
> Just upgraded to initscripts-5.44-1 from the one included in
> RH6.1, and was just wondering where the turning on of ipv4 forwarding is
> done now? I couldn't find it anywhere, and turned to taking the
> ipv4_forward_set() function out of
On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Tony Nugent wrote:
>
> >> John, it is obvious that neither of us is lying here, but both of
> >> us had very different experiences with Glint. I had so much
> >> trouble with it that I gave up on it. I was told it was buggy
> >
>
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Yuzz wrote:
>
> >Unable to load intepreter /lib/linux.so.2 ...
> >How to solve this problem??
>
> Sounds to me like you've maxed out your process table. The Linux
> process table can only hold 512 simultaneous processes. If you
>
On Sat, 19 Aug 2000, kmb wrote:
> Does anybody here know how to subscribe the the linux-kernel list?
Send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ('subscribe linux-kernel')
The original vger.rutgers.edu had a disk failure and the list was moved,
it's now being hosted by Red Hat (vger.kernel.org == vger.redhat
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Venkatesh Krishnamurthi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Has anyone had any success with automount/NIS ?
>
> Yes, with a YP server on Solaris. We use autofs to read the maps from YP
> and set up the mount points.
>
> However we've had to use the /etc/rc.d/init.d/autofs script from
On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, Danny James wrote:
> I would like to hide the linux boot process by showing an image instead of
> the boot process output. Any help on how this is accomplished would be
> greatly appreciated.
Take a look at Corel Linux which does just that (even giving you a choice
whether
On Wed, 5 Apr 2000, Vilius Puidokas wrote:
> hi,
> i've been folowing kickstart for a while lately..
> according to RH the bug with partitioning was fixed (or at least bug
> was closed on bugzilla), by adding --onpart. I checked installation code
> (one of the pre6.2) it doesn't look like --onp
On Wed, 5 Apr 2000, Anne POSSOZ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the redhat list where kickstart issues are discussed?
> Do we have only one? Could we get on only on that matter?
There's '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' which focuses only on this topic..
>
> We have kickstart running now for redhat 6.0 on our camp
30 matches
Mail list logo
