--- Michael Schwendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On
2002-05-02, Kevin Waterson wrote:
> stuff working. Nothing for Linux newbies. The text
> mode installer
> asks many specific questions about graphics adapter
> and monitor
> capabilities, that reminded me of old Slackware.
?!? There is no auto-
--- "Keith W. Sheffield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does that already include VAT?
>
> When I was in Ireland a couple years ago, I liked
> the fact that it was
> already included in the price, unlike the sales
> taxes in the US. In a
> nutshell, how is it different than US sales taxes?
AFAIK
--- Paul Dorneanu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's NOT the only price discrepancy. Let's look at
> macromedia products
> or adobe. In Europe (and Romania) they are more
> than double
Really? Bizarre indeed. Have not bought those products
themselves - people at primary school probably sti
--- Paul Dorneanu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am wondering what Redhat is doing with the alpha
> release. The last
> release for an alpha is the 7.1. Would be great to
> see a release in the
> coming future for the alpha platform, after the
> release of 7.3. I am
I once was looking forward
--- Tony Nugent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But my real reason for joining into this
> conversation is to give
> some recognition to redhat 6.2 -- arguably their
> best release so
> far, especially as a reliable server platform.
>
Ah yes :) That was the one with GNOME 1.2 and the
first Red Hat
--- Riku Meskanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is not really one UK English. You should once
> visit UK
> to find this out and be amazed how hard it's first
> to understand
> people from such a small geographical area. Picking
> up the ozzie
> or other dialects from noth america are lot eas
--- Bill Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> OK, it wasn't that funny, but I found a copy:
>
> http://www.bazza.com/sj/humour/Windiz98.html
>
> or
>
> http://www.billemon.org.uk/Fun/Windiz98.html
Funny enough for you to archive it at least :) It's
not PC, and I'd probably not show
--- Paul Dorneanu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you mean that there were no buggy releases of
> redhat?
Of course there is no such thing :) I recall that
anecdote:
"It is a truism that in any piece of software the
following two observations are true:
1. You can always shorten the code by one lin
--- Trevor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, but you've got Big Ben.
That's like saying you've got the Washington Monument
when you live in Arkansas - I need to travel 3 hours
to see the Big Ben :p
> RedHat is based in the US. That is their home turf
> (they must choose their
> battles careful
--- Trevor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Who knows... maybe it's because RH is trying to
> reach greater market
> penetration in the US then in Europe.
One would think they'll try to win over the European
market from SuSE. Right now SuSE wins on price and
especially on price/CD (8 CDs + DVD fo
--- John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > There's no excuse about translating the manual as
> here in UK the
> > manuals are all in English !
>
> English? Or American?
Good point :p. Cost breakdown would be:
...
$40 - piping draft text through aspell
...
Hello,
Red Hat boxed sets tend to be priced much higher than
the equivalent pricing in United States.
For instance,
Red Hat Linux: USA - $59.95, Europe - 112 euro
(112x0.90 = $100, or 67% higher)
Red Hat Linux professional: USA - about 120 dollars?
Europe - 230 euro
Americans earn 50% higher t
--- John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The $229 at
>
http://www.everythinglinux.com.au/cat/distributions/redhat?elinux=fbb
> 5971bd8446edb6fc692b26145b24e is definitely beyond
> MY budget.
>
That's *really* cheap. In Europe it's more like 230
Euro, which is probably at least 70% highe
--- Chris Tooley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > Is there any significantly more expensive factor
> behind the way Red Hat
> > prices its products overseas? I paid about 60
> pounds - 90 US dollars -
> > for Red Hat professional 7.2. No, it's not the
> version that
14 matches
Mail list logo
