Please correct your records
The current e-mail address for John Bullock should be
johnjamesbull...@gmail.com
Thank You..
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
Redhat-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel
Sorry all...I know that is inappropriate for this list...Didn't mean to
send it to everyone. My apologies.
~John Fabello
425-456-8900
-Original Message-
From: John Fabello
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 2:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: How to customize Linux rmdir s
Hi Bill,
I am a recruiter located here in Seattle and I am contacting you on
behalf of my client, Amazon.comWould you be interested in hearing
about an opportunity there?
Regards,
~John Fabello
425-456-8900
-Original Message-
From: Bill Rugolsky Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Alan Yang wrote:
so, I am stuck. what to do? I cannot reboot because it would panic
and if I do mkinitrd trying to make a valid img file that would also
fail due to the loop.o wasn't in the kernel that I booted from.
Boot the standard Red Hat kernel and then run mkinitrd.
jch
_
Alan Yang wrote:
Hello,
I ran into a situation where I don't know how to break the catch-22 cycle.
The scenario is like this:
0. from a DELL machine with scsi device
1. I installed the FreeSwan ipsec that seems like a rebuild of kernel is required
so that when insmod loads ipsec.o there wil
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Jonathan Bartlett wrote:
> The reason that normal startup scripts don't, is that there's no guarantee
> /bin/sh will point to bash, or even that bash is installed.
Have you tried to install RHL sans bash? Thought not.
RH _can_ make that guarantee.
--
Please, reply only to
Masahide Tomita wrote:
What I suspect is, that for log-in shell ulimit -c is set to unlimited
for sure, but for system wide setting, ulimit -c might be set to
different value.
So, what I want to know are :
How do I see a system wide value of ulimit -c ?
How do I set system wide value of ulimit -
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Richard Troy wrote:
>
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm just wondering: We just recently - last weekend - decided to "move
> into the modern era" on one of our server boxes running RedHat Linux. Our
> hardware selection was P4 2.6ghz, 800mhz fsb, with a gig of main memory on
> an Intel
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Rishabh Kumar Goel wrote:
> I have a Bencent 3.5" FireWire HDD. I also have a TI's TSB43ab22 iOHCI PCI
> card with a PCI-PCI bridge interface.
> When i plug the HDD into the card in my Pentium 4, i recieve the following
> errors:
> 1.Configrom Quadlet read error.
> 2.
On 19 Jul 2003, rahul patil wrote:
> hi,
> I want build an application that requires the exact memory address
> (for LCD display). I use ioremap to achieve that. However, when i
> try to compile the file, i get the following error.
>
> implicit declaration of ioremap
> and hence
> unreferenced
On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, John wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
>
> > Hi Sean,
> >
> > > So it seems to be "distro" relatedhmmm...
> >
> > Well, compiler version related (but afaik only Red Hat ships the gcc-2.96
>
On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, 7 Jul 2003 02:24:38 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
>
> > Hi Sean,
> >
> > > So it seems to be "distro" relatedhmmm...
> >
> > Well, compiler version related (but afaik only Red
On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> > So it seems to be "distro" relatedhmmm...
>
> Well, compiler version related (but afaik only Red Hat ships the gcc-2.96
> compiler). On my Red Hat 7.3 system the error also is reproducible. You should
I had a mate check o
On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> > So it seems to be "distro" relatedhmmm...
>
> Well, compiler version related (but afaik only Red Hat ships the gcc-2.96
> compiler). On my Red Hat 7.3 system the error also is reproducible. You should
> probably report a b
On 6 Jul 2003, Sean Bruno wrote:
> So it seems to be "distro" relatedhmmm...
>
I don't have a RHL 8.0 or 9 system to test on. If you can take the time,
build gcc (the most likely candidate) from the tarball contained in the
src.rpm and see whether that has the problem. The spec file contains
On 6 Jul 2003, Sean Bruno wrote:
> I have been troubleshooting an issue with a multi-threaded application
> port from Solaris X86 to Linux.
>
> It was randomly dumping core on "main" or other random parts of code.
>
> After hacking on the issue for about a week, I decided to write a little
> hel
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to build a stackguarded gcc-2.96-RH73 from the latest StackGuard
> patch that can be found at http://www.immunix.org/stackguard.html (updated
> june 2003!). Problem is I keep getting
> stage1/crtbegin.o(.text+0x9d): undef
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Maxim Koshelev wrote:
> Thanks Thomas,
> I'll try this workarround today.
> But why redhat team distribute such broken library?
Ah, the joys of bleeding-edge software.
--
Please, reply only to the list.
Join the "Linux Support by Small Businesses" list at
http://mail.co
On 4 Jun 2003, Vladimir Djokic wrote:
>
> Good day,
> People. I'm trying to build distro originated from RH9. I've managed to
> modify anaconda, but have a few other questions (legal):
>
> (1) kudzu says something like: 'Hardware probing tool...(C) 2003 Red
> Hat, Inc.'. I'm fi
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Jonathan Atkinson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am considering creating my own little Linux distribution for use by me
> and my friends. I'm an intermediate linux user, and I would like to do
> this to enhance my knowledge of Linux, plus I think it's be a fun little
> project :-) I am
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Ajay Bansal wrote:
> ne thing over here???
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ajay Bansal
> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 6:03 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hi All
>
> We are moving our application built on linux 7.3 (with gcc 3.2.1) to
> Linux advanced server 2.1.
rary's unloaded, it's not open any more. The lsof
command can tell you what files are open. You might need a sleep(600);
at some crucial point.
Have you tried gdb on this?
It works best if you compile with debugging options.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John [mai
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A brief description of the problem we see on Linux 9 follows:
>
> Please let me know if any of you have seen this problem or know how to
> tackle it!
>
>
> I have a "mylib.so" that calls:
>
> _init()
> {
>pthread_atfork(NULL, Parent
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Roberto F. Brandao wrote:
> Hello
>
>Sorry for asking this on this list, but this subject might
> interest some of you.
>I need to boot a diskless thin client and make it download
> the linux kernel image from a server. The server is working
> fine, including both DHC
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003, Hemanshu Kanji Bhadra, Noida wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> is anyone knows of freely available IDEs for Embedded Linux Development
> under redhat 7.3..?
A _lot_ of people swear by emacs. xemacs is a near cousin.
Both go far to help with the edit/build/debug cycle.
emacs does take s
On 26 Mar 2003, hossein aminaiee wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm looking forward to a good tutorial on linux source. I would be
> glad if anyone helps me about what source to work on and a good tutorial
> on that source (if there is any).
>
Which of the millions of source interest you?
--
Please, r
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Hemanshu Kanji Bhadra, Noida wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was trying to write a simple hello kernel module from the book, "embedded
> linux interfacing", I got many errors in module.h and proc_fs.h header
> files.
>
> can anyone have a sample kernel module program for redhat linux
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Don Dade wrote:
> Why is it that list Nazis never understand that if it is s bad to post
> an off-topic message, it is equally bad to reply to it and double the amount
> of off topic messages?
He, like you, needs education. People are on this list to discuss
developmen
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Ajay Bansal wrote:
> How can I add it later.
>
> For the time being: requirement is to add ftp server support to RH box..
1. Read the RH documentation. It answers this question and many more.
2. This is not a devleopmentissue in any sense, and there are better
lists for it.
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Thomas Dodd wrote:
>
>
> Vijeth Bhat wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > Is there a CDE devkit available on Red Hat ? If so,
> > Does it get installed with the standard distribution ?
> > I am using 7.2 and I did not find the diretories
> > /usr/dt /usr/dt/lib etc., as found in solaris
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Thomas Dodd wrote:
>
>
> John wrote:
> > My own bias favours KDE over Gnome because
> > . I believe C++ a better programming language for this kind of work
> > than C. It does more to help programmers avoid silly errors such as
> >
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, sameer jha wrote:
> Hi All!!
>
> Well which one is better from an impartial point of view GTK or QT for
> desktop app devlopment??
What programming language do you prefer? While Gnome is written in C and
KDE in C++, there are bindings in each for the other.
Which environme
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, sameer jha wrote:
> Hi All!!
> Well when does a Kernel Panic occurs?
> When I recently booted my RH7.2 box it got stuck up while ...
> file system in the first attempt.
>
> After that I tried again, this time it dropped me to a shell after
> which I tried to fsck my disk whic
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Andrew Thomson wrote:
> Anyone had any luck with this combination?
>
> When I try to install it, it's not picked up by the installer so the
> installer then doesn't pick up any drives!!!
>
> However I can install this card on an installed system at it is found.
> This was do
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, lar lar wrote:
> i have a server that's dead, when it boots up it gives the
> following message, complaining it cant find initrd:
> "Kernel Panic: No init found. Try passing init= option to kernel"
> booting with linux init=/bin/sh, it still complains about not
> finding init
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, sameer jha wrote:
> Hi There!!
> Would anyone please give me pointers as to where an NTFS driver for
> RHL 7.2 can be obtained.
You build your own kernel. The source is there, but RH thinks it
unreliable.
> Is it part of the RHL 8 release?
Same answer.
--
Please, reply onl
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Sergio Alejandro Gonzalez wrote:
> Hi everybody...
>
> Sorry, but this bug in RH80 is "bugging" me all the time. When I issue the
> command
>
> > make menuconfig
>
> everything works fine, except the video! The text structure is corrupted,
> and you simply not see what i
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Ajay Bansal wrote:
> Is there any setting on RH Linux, which prevents the binaries searching
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH from being searched at run time. I have an executable
> which only looks in default library search path & totally ignores
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
>
PATH is for executabl
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Larry Greenleaf wrote:
>
> Actually, I found the answer without help from this list...I installed SuSE
> instead.
Good luck!
--
Please, reply only to the list.
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https:/
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Ajay Bansal wrote:
>
> If no, can we get one (as a patch or a package)?
>
> If my scripts are running with ksh originally (i.e. on other Unix
> boxes), what is the best option available with us on Linux boxes?
It's available, not not ordinarily installed. If you can avoid i
ons need to be resolved at
runtime
and thus programs come up faster.
[summer@hawk summer]$
It may be new in RHL 8.0.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 2:55 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Gcc libra
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, John wrote:
> I've finally got round to fiddling with curses, and I've got a test
> program that works some of the time.
>
> The immediate concern is the mouse. It works in an xterm window, and as
> I read the docs it's supposed to work
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Ajay Bansal wrote:
> Can I do static linking in such a way that only gcc static libraries are
> linked. With -static option, all the libraries expected are of static in
> nature, whereas my product has 100 shared libs of its own and it is
> _not_ possible to have that static i
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Jonathan Bartlett wrote:
> Actually, I believe the load time can be faster on static linking,
> especially for C++ because it takes a lot of time for the linker to
> resolve those dynamic links. I could be mistaken, though.
>
man prelink
--
Please, reply only to the list.
I've finally got round to fiddling with curses, and I've got a test
program that works some of the time.
The immediate concern is the mouse. It works in an xterm window, and as
I read the docs it's supposed to work on a Linux VC with gpm active.
Well, it doesn't, at least for me.
I'm running RHL
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Ajay Bansal wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I am using gcc 3.2.1 for building my code.
>
> Now the end customer may not have the shared libs used by gcc like
> libstdc++so.5 etc.
>
> Can I ship these libraries along with the product? Or Do I have to
> follow some procedure
read the l
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Randy Gillis wrote:
> Does 8.0 have a kernel-headers package?
It's renamed: glibc-kernheaders-2.4-7.20
>
>
>
> How do I synchronize /usr/src/linux-2.4 source TO /usr/include and the
> system libraries, once I have installed kernel-source?
You don't, unless you're going
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Larry Greenleaf wrote:
>
> Some of you seem to forget that you were new to Linux once.
I remember well. I got it (Slackware) on a book by Matt Welsh.
When I discovered that was "old" I bought a boxed set and read the
printed manuals.
When I got OS/2, I read the manuals. OS
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, wo shi ni baba wrote:
>
> I knew I would get some flamy follow ups like this from pests like you, didn't I
>tell you not to send any follow ups??
> here are my answers to your question:
> 1. I did read the documentation, but briefly, so what? Not everyone is patient
>enough
do you think we're being paid to provide this free
support?
The first thing to do in solving a problem is to read the documentation.
It happens, you'd have had the answer hours ago had you tried that, and
done so without making yourself a pest.
>
> John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, wo shi ni baba wrote:
>
> hi folks,
>
> I am running redhat 8.0 on an intel machine, I installed an application by using rpm
>-i prog.rpm, but when I tried to remove it by rpm -e prog.rpm, it couldn't remove it,
>so I removed the program files manually. However, when I tri
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Larry Greenleaf wrote:
>
> I think I am going to build a monolithic kernel. That is a kernel with no modules. I
>can't have module problems if there are no modules to cause problems :)
Do remember that Red Hat's configuration tools _expect_ you to use
modules. It's possible
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Kevin McConnell wrote:
>
> --- John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As I understand it, he's trying to control which NIC
> > is used to install.
> > Reoving support for other NICs does not affect
> > what's used later.
> >
On 3 Feb 2003, Che wrote:
> Hello!
> i am not sure if thats the 100% accurate place to post that but id have
I guess BZ is the place to request it, this a good place to discuss it.
> a small feature request that wouldnt cause much trouble but would be of
> great use.
>
> Would it be considerab
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Ajay Bansal wrote:
> Do you really have to have FAT??? Try NTFS
>
At least on NT 4, partitions get created FAT and converted later,
according to the partition information.
--
Please, reply only to the list.
___
Redhat-devel-li
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Kevin McConnell wrote:
>
> --- John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Removing the modules for the NICs you don't want to
> > use will force the
> > issue;-)
>
> I thought he was trying to designate which card he
> wants to be e
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Lars Damerow wrote:
> >From Kevin McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 11:32:44AM -0800:
> >
> > --- Lars Damerow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >From Kevin McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Wed, Jan
> > > 29, 2003 at 11:13:23AM -0800:
> > > >
> > > > This is j
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Kevin McConnell wrote:
>
> --- Lars Damerow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there any way I can make the device naming more
> > clear?
>
> This is just something to get your mind working. I
> know there is a way to pass options to modules as
> they're loaded. Using the IR
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Tom Sanders wrote:
> I have two application servers running at different
> machines and I want to provide a function call type
> (synchronous) interface to applications.
>
> This operation may mean one server to send/receive
> data from another server. Since I want applicatio
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Thomas Dodd wrote:
> >and I bet you did not get the point, me thinks.
> >
> >
>
> I don't think so... If adding a new disk is not possible, use a file,
> the wonder of loop devices :) While people regularly use loop mounts for
> CD and floppy images or the initrd, they fo
I make a change like:
>
> title Red Hat Linux (2.4.18-19.8.0)
> root (hd0,2)
> kernel /vmlinuz-2.4.18-19.8.0 ro root=LABEL=/ hdc=ide-scsi
> initrd /initrd-2.4.18-19.8.0.img.bogus
>
> I get different errors, without the kernel booting through the I
On 9 Jan 2003, Benjamin Vogt wrote:
> I am using the 2.4.18-19.8.0 kernel and since then I have been having quite
> a number of problems compiling programs in any way. I am personally not a
> developer, but I was hoping to gain some insight on this issue.
>
> Whenever I compile a program, I will
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Riku Meskanen wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Could anybody from Red Hat comment why the appended message was not
> delivered to list from our end?
>
Instead of bothering *all* ths subscribers, why not use the website to
locate the list administrator?
Quite possibly, the administrator d
On 5 Jan 2003, Adam Manock wrote:
>
> mount: error 16 mounting proc
> Creating block devices
> Creating root device
> mkrootdev: label / not found
> Mounting root filesystem
> kmod: failed to exec /sbin/modprobe -s -k ext3, errno = 2
> kmod: failed to exec /sbin/modprobe -s -k freeext3, err
On Sun, 29 Dec 2002, Rodger Donaldson wrote:
>
> Starting with 8, and apprently to continue with 8.1, postgresql
> appears to be lacking large chunks of hitherto present functionality,
> such as the pgaccess client. Are there any plans to restore this, or
> are we supposed to rush off and buy th
On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Abhilash wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Is there mirror driver support in linux?
> In windows we have mirror/filter drivers whats the equivalent of that in linux?
> Thank you.
I don't know what the mirrot driver is, but it sounds like you might be
talking about one of the RAID optio
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Joseph D. Wagner wrote:
> I've downloaded kernel version 2.4.20 from http://www.kernel.org and copied
> it to the /usr/src/linux-2.4.20 directory, but when I do "make xconfig" (or
> any other "make" for that matter, it exits with error code 2.
>
> I figure there is some Redha
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Tesla 13 wrote:
> > > Even if I don't gain anything, I just don't want my binaries to run on a
> > > bloody 386 SX. Period.
> >
> >If procinfo shows 91% idle (as it does on my Athlon), then how much is
> >there to gain? 10% of 9% is bugger-all.
>
> I CPU used is about 3%. But
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Tesla 13 wrote:
> >Mind you, a lot can easily be gained if you have a lot of computers.
>
> 32 to be exact!
Better than 1, but I think you need hundreds, not tens, to get a
payoff.
However, optimising some few packages - XFree, your preferred wm, OOo if
you use it may be wor
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Tesla 13 wrote:
> Hello John,
>
> >What on earth do you hope to gain?
>
> Even if I don't gain anything, I just don't want my binaries to run on a
> bloody 386 SX. Period.
If procinfo shows 91% idle (as it does on my Athlon), then how much
On 12 Dec 2002, Florin Andrei wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 14:09, John wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Tesla 13 wrote:
> > >
> > > I would like to adapt a Redhat 8.0 system to Pentium 4. The binaries, data,
> > > files and everything will be used, run
On 12 Dec 2002, Florin Andrei wrote:
> On a very busy web server, it makes sense to optimize httpd, but the
> rest is a waste of time.
>
>
Even then, I'm doubtful. More likely the bottleneck is the network
interface.
btw if a dual P4 isn't good enough, try dual Athlon. Apparently Athlons
eat
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello
>
> No one on the redhat-list knows the answer to this ... Has any seen a
> similar message:
>
> /usr/path/executable: invalid character 58 in exportstr for E:%s\\krb5kt"
>
> I cloned my RedHat 7 system disk with Ghost onto another hdd inst
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Tesla 13 wrote:
> Hello Folks,
>
> I would like to adapt a Redhat 8.0 system to Pentium 4. The binaries, data,
> files and everything will be used, run and compiled on P4. I have no issue
> with compatability and I do not need anything to run on a 386, Pentium or
> PIII --
On Sat, 7 Dec 2002, Carlos wrote:
> Em Sab 07 Dez 2002 13:01, John escreveu:
>
> > XFree comes with a couple. Debian has another, and _that_ needs some
> > attention.
> >
> > So, Why write an application like Xconfigurator?
>
> Can you tell me more about Deb
On Sat, 7 Dec 2002, Carlos wrote:
> Em Qua 04 Dez 2002 20:57, John escreveu:
> > On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Carlos wrote:
> > > Em Qua 04 Dez 2002 04:48, John escreveu:
> > > > On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Carlos wrote:
> > > > > I was thinking about w
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Carlos wrote:
> Em Qua 04 Dez 2002 04:48, John escreveu:
> > On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Carlos wrote:
> > > I was thinking about writing a application like Xconfigurator using
> > > ncurses. Wha
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Carlos wrote:
> I was thinking about writing a application like Xconfigurator using ncurses.
> What do you think?
>
Why?
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-dev
On 2 Dec 2002, Florin Andrei wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 10:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Is it possible to build it on 8.0 so that it can run
> > on 6.2? If so, how?
>
> Use VMware. :-P
Better than that, install 6.2 to another partition/drive and then chroot
to it to build.
However,
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Guruhema Prasad N wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using redhatLinux8.0, I am facing the following problems, can you
> please help any body.
> Problem 1:-
> I am using option "gcc -Wuninitialized -O -ansi", but its giving
> undeclared variables for the math defines "M_PI" which is de
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Jiangbo wrote:
>
> Hi, all,
>
> Would you please have a look to the following code for me? This code has no
>compile error, but it will get an error message "unresolved symbol sys_semctl". I
>don't know why.
>
> /* gcc -c -Wall test.c*/
>
I don't have asm/uacces
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Riku Meskanen wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Anybody have still copy of kernel-smp-2.4.18-10.i686.rpm
> available? I would appreciate a link, it seems to have
> disappeared from Red Hat mirrors.
>
> The last two issues kernel-smp-2.4.18-{17,18}.7.x.i686.rpm
> seem *very* unstable on DE
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, David HM Spector wrote:
>
> I made the mistake of trying to upgrade a RH7.3 based ISP2150 to
> RH8.0... now its dead. The system gets into an endless SCSI
> sleep/reset loop when trying to access its disks via the AIC7XXX driver.
>
> This was a serious problem as RH7.2
se you are now redefining some
structures with kernel space definitions.
What are your plans for including netfilter into your program? Do
you need to access it's kernel side implementation, or would it be
sufficient to manipulate it through user space calls?
-John Matthews
-
access to about these
> incompatibilities ?
The kernel and its modules do not use any runtime library. It's entirely
self-contained.
Don't mix compiler versions though, compile _all_ the kernel with the same
compiler.
--
Cheers
John.
Please, no off-list mail. You will fall
On Monday 21 October 2002 22:50, Chris Tooley wrote:
> from 2.4.10-2.4.16 should be avoided if possible.
.15 should be avoided in _every_ circumstance.
>
--
Cheers
John.
Please, no off-list mail. You will fall foul of my spam treatment.
Join the "Linux Support by Small Business
Is
this a M-Sys DiskOnChip 2000 ? if so this may help.
Just a
note you will also need to check that the drivers work on RH 6.1 as I know
the current ones available.1 (at the M-sys) work on RH 6.2 (not sure if they
will work as I have not used RH6.1).
The
older drivers (come with 121 utilit
On Wednesday 16 October 2002 23:11, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> Donno about KDE 3.1, but you can grab KDE 3.0.4 RPMS for Red Hat 8.0 from
> www.kde.org.
Without the Red Hat "enhancements?"
--
Cheers
John.
Please, no off-list mail. You will fall foul of my spam treatment.
Join th
6 when CPU is a 686. Wrong.
>
> In a nutshell, you're saying that gcc sucks.
> Don't get me wrong, i don't say you're not right. But one would expect a
> compiler to do "the right thing". Seems like gcc doesn't.
I think you misunderstood what was said
On Friday 06 September 2002 14:56, ancha.trong wrote:
>
The best people to ask hang out on the list pertaining to your release of Red
hat Linux.
However, they won't be at all impressed by this broken-down much. They'll like
you a lot better if you post in plain text.
--
ctually, it's probably true if its vendor built it.
--
Cheers
John.
Please, no off-list mail. You will fall foul of my spam treatment.
Join the "Linux Support by Small Businesses" list at
http://mail.computerdatasafe.com.au/mailman/listinfo/lssb
t satisfy dependencies unless rebuilt.
That may reduce the need for "mdk" and such in package names.
--
Cheers
John.
Please, no off-list mail. You will fall foul of my spam treatment.
Join the "Linux Support by Small Businesses"
r users to setup swap later. If they don't know what they're
doing, they might omit the mkswap command and wonder why it's not working.
--
Cheers
John.
Please, no off-list mail. You will fall foul of my spam treatment.
Join the "Linux Su
might be fixable by having its full package name imlib-1.9.13-3 and
requiring appropriate versions of redhat-release.
--
Cheers
John.
Please, no off-list mail. You will fall foul of my spam treatment.
Join the "Linux Support by Small Businesses" list at
http://mail.computerdatasaf
On Saturday 31 August 2002 23:10, Chip Turner wrote:
> > Try reporting that as a bug and see what the response is.
>
>
>
> But it isn't a bug. It's just how the algorithm works.
>
>
A badly-chosen algorithm is still a bug.
--
Cheers
John.
Please, no
On Friday 30 August 2002 00:41, Chip Turner wrote:
> To rpm, 1.61 and 1.061 are the same. But 1.6.1 and 1.0.6.1 are
> different.
Try reporting that as a bug and see what the response is.
--
Cheers
John.
Please, no off-list mail. You will fall foul of my spam treatment.
Join the
ocale"
command doesn't seem to
provide charmap data.
John Ellson
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
RH's website.
--
Cheers
John.
Please, no off-list mail. You will fall foul of my spam treatment.
Join the "Linux Support by Small Businesses" list at
http://mail.computerdatasafe.com.au/mailman/listinfo/lssb
___
Redhat-devel-list m
On Thursday 15 August 2002 01:38, Albert E. Whale wrote:
> I'm not sure why, but this version breaks the authentication of a fresh
> RedHat 7.2 install.
Why are we asking installation/configuration questions on a development list?
--
Cheers
John.
Please, no off-list mail. You wil
On Wednesday 31 July 2002 06:35, Akop Pogosian wrote:
> Does anyone know why ispell had to be replaced with aspell in the
> RedHat Linux 7.x releases?
Probably because it's better. I personally made the switch before RH did.
The compatibility issue is another matter, and something you should rep
1 - 100 of 772 matches
Mail list logo
