you'd
have to allocate to really force paging.
That said, there is a getconf param for available phys pages
% echo $[ $(getconf _AVPHYS_PAGES) * $(getconf PAGE_SIZE) / 1024 ] KB free
4804 KB free
might get stuck parsing /proc/meminfo otherwise.
James
--
James Manning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
[Mike A. Harris]
> I'm working on a procmail recipe to filter out all HTML postings,
> and wondering if anyone can help.
for mutt users, you can "auto_view text/html" in .muttrc and it'll
lynx -dump and put the output in-line. Very handy.
--
James Manning &
[Samdeep Nayak]
> Is there any kernel debugger available on linux??
http://www.google.com/linux?q=kernel+debugger
http://oss.sgi.com/projects/kdb/
http://oss.sgi.com/projects/kgdb/
http://www.us.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/ikd/
James
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL
[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Is there a way to do this without disclosing the password in the
> lilo.conf file??
While a mode 600 should suffice, it may be a useful hack for lilo to put
in an md5 or crypt capability (the password checking code isn't part of
the MBR write, is it? If so, this is certainl
ask about those (and also ask SGI and maybe one or
> two others).
>
> Perhaps James Manning would comment?
http://www.storage.ibm.com/hardsoft/products/ess/ess.htm
If you decide to more do-it-yourself, IBM drives are nice too:
http://www.storage.ibm.com/hardsoft/diskdrdl/prod/us36xp.htm
[Chris Abbey]
> [root@tweedle /mnt]# df /dev/sda1
> Filesystem 1024-blocks Used Available Capacity Mounted on
> /dev/sda1 939573 628943 262093 71% /
> [root@tweedle /mnt]# df /dev/sda
> Filesystem 1024-blocks Used Available Capacity Mounted on
> /dev/sda
[John Summerfield]
> > The official stance (last time I saw Alan write on the subject) was
> > that 2.95.x tickles kernel bugs that egcs 1.1.2 and gcc 2.7.2.3 don't,
> > so as of yet kernels are still best compiled with older compilers.
>
> Compile-time? or do they show at run-time?
The only thi
[John Summerfield]
> Can this compile safely be used for compiling everything?
>
> I'm most concerned about kernels (2.2 and 2.3), but I compile quite a lot
> of other stuff here.
The official stance (last time I saw Alan write on the subject) was
that 2.95.x tickles kernel bugs that egcs 1.1.2
[ Tuesday, February 1, 2000 ] Kevin Waterson wrote:
> Tony Nugent wrote:
> > Let the old #!/bin/bash scripts break -- they need to be fixed.
> >
> > The sooner "echo $BASH_VERSION" returns 2.x by default, the better...
>
> perhaps a simple bash2 script to update bash1 scripts?
Perhaps an RH-spe
