Re: GCC Differences

2002-06-14 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
ot" returns an "unspecified" value when y != 20, thus different versions of gcc may effectively produce different values. Conclusion, always compile with -Wall :-). -- Guillaume Cottenceau ___ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list

Re: pthread bug...?

2002-05-15 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
tid1,NULL,thrfunc,NULL); See you. -- Guillaume Cottenceau, MandrakeSoft See you on Cooker! http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/cookerdevel.php3 ___ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list

Re: Numlock

2001-04-02 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
/usr/X11R6/man/man1/enable_X11_numlock.1.bz2 (binary is coming from code by Lubos Lunak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> that produces fake X events to simulate the num lock key push under X) -- Guillaume Cottenceau, MandrakeSoft See you on Cooker! http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/cookerdevel.php3

Re: Structural security problems in Redhat 7

2001-01-24 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
But you won't make many sendmail experts switch to postfix *that* easily. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://us.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/ ___ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list