On 14 Jun 2002, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> Chris Rode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> > float toot(int x, float y) {
> >if (y == 20) {
> > return y;
> >} else {
> > toot(x, x*y); (**)
> >}
&
I'm honestly not trying to resurrect some gcc 2.96 flame war or anything
here, but I'm not a very seasoned C programmer, and I've run across an
inconsistancy between Red Hat's version of gcc, and gcc 2.95.4 on a Debian
system. Consider the following uninspired, pointless piece of code:
#inclu
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote:
>
> Yeah, I got that part allready. It isn't getting included
> though. The %setup part needs to place the file in with the
> source code to begin with and it is not. That is the problem I'm
> having. I'm sure it is simple, but can't quite get it.
T
On 18 Aug 2000, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Rode ) writes:
>
> > On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> >
> > This much is right. To get the file included in the binary RPM, in the
> > %install section of the spec:
&g
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> I have:
>
> package.tgz and "filename.init" in SOURCES.
> I want filename.init added to the package as well when it is
> built. I've tried various combinations of:
>
> Source: package.tgz
> Source1: filename.init
This much is right. To get the fi
