Re: nameif with PCMCIA nics

2003-09-05 Thread Al Potter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > You can edit the files by hand, having the device/alias be that should > work. I've done that at the 7.3 level with great success, but the changes to the script structure in 9 (I skipped 8, first time ever) evaded me, and I went back to the gui to make the entries and

Re: nameif with PCMCIA nics

2003-09-04 Thread Al Potter
While we're on the subject, and I apologize in advance for asking here, I've been fooling with the madwifi drivers for the Atheros chipset wireless cardbus and pcmcia cards. This driver was ported from $BSD, and the company name _is_ Atheros, so it shows up in linux as ath0, not eth0. This see

Re: (no subject)

2003-02-06 Thread Al Potter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > >On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Ed Greshko wrote: > > > Where's fire hose when you need it? > > man locate Use the right tool for the job locate cluebat AL ___ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.

Re: dependency-based init scripts?

2003-01-06 Thread Al Potter
> > Look at serel (www.fastboot.org). I was surprised to see an RPM in Rawhide a > > few weeks ago ... > > Not only Rawhide but it's included in the new Phoebe beta as well... Yep, it's there. What does one need to do to get it to work? I've installed the RPM, and don't see any support for it

RPM and Stoopid versioning schemes

2002-09-03 Thread Al Potter
OK, I threw the bait out, and lot of folks have chimed in, so I know that I am not the only one frustrated here CONTEXT: All rpm builds are controlled by the .spec file. If versioning is weird, it's weirdness is specific, and on a per-package basis. SUGGESTION: Build a framework (macro?

Re: perl module version ordering differing from RPM

2002-08-31 Thread Al Potter
> John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Friday 30 August 2002 00:41, Chip Turner wrote: > > > To rpm, 1.61 and 1.061 are the same. But 1.6.1 and 1.0.6.1 are > > > different. > > > > Try reporting that as a bug and see what the response is. > > But it isn't a bug. It's just how the algorit

Re: fonts

2002-07-18 Thread Al Potter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > And the fix? All you had to do was reorder the font list in > XF86Config. Change from what to what different, and what kind of difference is that supposed to make? AL ___ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: large files?

2002-02-03 Thread Al Potter
OK, then does this inply that the largest (ext2|ext3|reiserfs|$fs) filesytem is also 2Gb? Where (if anywhere) is this documented / FAQ'd as a hard limit? TIA AL > 2 gig is the largest natural positive integer in a 32bit machine. All > other numbers are negative, and are generally consider