Rawhide & glibc-2.3.1-51

2003-02-25 Thread Robert Hardy
I'm not sure if this is the correct forum to ask about Rawhide RPMs. Please be kind and let me know if it isn't. I'm wondering what has changed recently wrt/ locales & glibc-2.3.1-51. In particular how do I make man happy again? I was using glibc-2.3.1-5 before I recently upgraded. I see this wh

Re: Is ksh available by default on Linux boxes???

2003-02-25 Thread Joshua Daniel Franklin
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Ajay Bansal wrote: > If no, can we get one (as a patch or a package)? > > If my scripts are running with ksh originally (i.e. on other Unix > boxes), what is the best option available with us on Linux boxes? You can get the real thing here: http://www.research.att.com/~gsf/c

Re: Is ksh available by default on Linux boxes???

2003-02-25 Thread James Olin Oden
> > > If no, can we get one (as a patch or a package)? > > If my scripts are running with ksh originally (i.e. on other Unix > boxes), what is the best option available with us on Linux boxes? > As someone has already said it is available; the rpm is pdksh. Beyond that, bash is mostly a superse

Re: Is ksh available by default on Linux boxes???

2003-02-25 Thread John
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Ajay Bansal wrote: > > If no, can we get one (as a patch or a package)? > > If my scripts are running with ksh originally (i.e. on other Unix > boxes), what is the best option available with us on Linux boxes? It's available, not not ordinarily installed. If you can avoid i

Is ksh available by default on Linux boxes???

2003-02-25 Thread Ajay Bansal
If no, can we get one (as a patch or a package)? If my scripts are running with ksh originally (i.e. on other Unix boxes), what is the best option available with us on Linux boxes? -Ajay ___ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://