On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 00:21, Jean Francois Martinez wrote:
> > Perhaps Gentoo is more appropriate in this case than Red Hat?>
> <
> Perhaps. But that supposes that compiling with --march=pentium4 makes
> much difference with gcc. I don't doubt it would make a real difference
> with the Intel com
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 04:02, Gary Sandine wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 19:42, John wrote:
> > However, if you wish to persist with building everything yourself, the
> > the project for you is "Linux from Scratch."
>
> Perhaps Gentoo is more appropriate in this case than Red Hat? It's not
> as e
*blink* *blink*
Thank you.
- Original Message -
From: "Binand Raj S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 10:09 PM
Subject: Re: How to get RedHat 8.0 to allow core dump files
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 09:48:19PM -0600, Dan Winslow wrote:
> > cor
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 09:48:19PM -0600, Dan Winslow wrote:
> core file size(blocks, -c) unlimited
> This is in the current shell I am running programs from. It will not produce
> a core dump file. The fault says :
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> So its trying to dump, but.no file
Yep, /etc/profile is taken care of. Here's output from ulimit -a :
core file size(blocks, -c) unlimited
data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited
file size (blocks, -f) unlimited
max locked memory (kbytes, -l) unlimited
max memory size (kbytes, -m) unlimited
open f
> btw if a dual P4 isn't good enough, try dual Athlon. Apparently Athlons
> eat Pentium IVs; sometimes even Durons outperform them.
Dual P4 = dual Xeon, and a dual Xeon will thump on any dual Athlon
system in any task I can think of.
It used to be the case that uni-Athlon in general outperformed
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 19:42, John wrote:
> However, if you wish to persist with building everything yourself, the
> the project for you is "Linux from Scratch."
Perhaps Gentoo is more appropriate in this case than Red Hat? It's not
as extreme an approach as LFS, but with Gentoo, one can easily co
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Tesla 13 wrote:
> > > Even if I don't gain anything, I just don't want my binaries to run on a
> > > bloody 386 SX. Period.
> >
> >If procinfo shows 91% idle (as it does on my Athlon), then how much is
> >there to gain? 10% of 9% is bugger-all.
>
> I CPU used is about 3%. But
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Tesla 13 wrote:
> >Mind you, a lot can easily be gained if you have a lot of computers.
>
> 32 to be exact!
Better than 1, but I think you need hundreds, not tens, to get a
payoff.
However, optimising some few packages - XFree, your preferred wm, OOo if
you use it may be wor
> Even if I don't gain anything, I just don't want my binaries to run on a
> bloody 386 SX. Period.
If procinfo shows 91% idle (as it does on my Athlon), then how much is
there to gain? 10% of 9% is bugger-all.
I CPU used is about 3%. But that really is not the point as I explained
above.
Did
Mind you, a lot can easily be gained if you have a lot of computers.
32 to be exact!
Jimmy
_
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Tesla 13 wrote:
> Hello John,
>
> >What on earth do you hope to gain?
>
> Even if I don't gain anything, I just don't want my binaries to run on a
> bloody 386 SX. Period.
If procinfo shows 91% idle (as it does on my Athlon), then how much is
there to gain? 10% of 9% is bu
On 12 Dec 2002, Florin Andrei wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 14:09, John wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Tesla 13 wrote:
> > >
> > > I would like to adapt a Redhat 8.0 system to Pentium 4. The binaries, data,
> > > files and everything will be used, run and compiled on P4. I have no issue
> > >
On 12 Dec 2002, Florin Andrei wrote:
> On a very busy web server, it makes sense to optimize httpd, but the
> rest is a waste of time.
>
>
Even then, I'm doubtful. More likely the bottleneck is the network
interface.
btw if a dual P4 isn't good enough, try dual Athlon. Apparently Athlons
eat
Hello John,
What on earth do you hope to gain?
Even if I don't gain anything, I just don't want my binaries to run on a
bloody 386 SX. Period.
It will takes days, maybe weeks on a single machine.
gcc + glibc + kernel takes a mere 3 hours on my system to compile (2.66 GHz
P4 OCed to 3.0, mo
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 14:09, John wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Tesla 13 wrote:
> >
> > I would like to adapt a Redhat 8.0 system to Pentium 4. The binaries, data,
> > files and everything will be used, run and compiled on P4. I have no issue
> > with compatability and I do not need anything to
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 18:54, Dan Winslow wrote:
> Platform is a fresh install of RedHat 8.0. I have
> ulimit -c unlimited
> in /etc/profile. I have write perms to the current dir. A test program
> compiled with gcc that does a 'strcpy(0,0)' seg faults but does not
> core
> dump. I have searched all
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 05:29, Tesla 13 wrote:
>
> I would like to adapt a Redhat 8.0 system to Pentium 4. The binaries, data,
> files and everything will be used, run and compiled on P4. I have no issue
> with compatability and I do not need anything to run on a 386, Pentium or
> PIII -- only P4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What is the proper method for building an i686 binary kernel RPM? Each time I try to
build one, using `rpmbuild -bb -target i686-redhat-linux kernel-2.4.spec` I get
compile errors (different errors depending on whether I have the vserver patches
Platform is a
fresh install of RedHat 8.0. I haveulimit -c unlimitedin /etc/profile. I
have write perms to the current dir. A test programcompiled with gcc that
does a 'strcpy(0,0)' seg faults but does not coredump. I have searched all
day on the web, finding nothing but ulimitsettings. Any
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello
>
> No one on the redhat-list knows the answer to this ... Has any seen a
> similar message:
>
> /usr/path/executable: invalid character 58 in exportstr for E:%s\\krb5kt"
>
> I cloned my RedHat 7 system disk with Ghost onto another hdd inst
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Tesla 13 wrote:
> Hello Folks,
>
> I would like to adapt a Redhat 8.0 system to Pentium 4. The binaries, data,
> files and everything will be used, run and compiled on P4. I have no issue
> with compatability and I do not need anything to run on a 386, Pentium or
> PIII --
Hello
No one on the redhat-list knows the answer to this ... Has any seen a
similar message:
/usr/path/executable: invalid character 58 in exportstr for E:%s\\krb5kt"
I cloned my RedHat 7 system disk with Ghost onto another hdd installed on
the same system. After taking the original hdd offl
Hello Folks,
I would like to adapt a Redhat 8.0 system to Pentium 4. The binaries, data,
files and everything will be used, run and compiled on P4. I have no issue
with compatability and I do not need anything to run on a 386, Pentium or
PIII -- only P4.
Is there a location where I can read a
24 matches
Mail list logo
