On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Carlos wrote:
> Em Seg 02 Dez 2002 21:57, Peter Bowen escreveu:
> > On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 17:02, Carlos wrote:
> > > Why did you use dietlibc? Why did you not use glibc ?
> >
> > dietlibc, as the name suggests, is a lightweight libc. It generates
> > noticibly smaller static
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Carlos wrote:
> I was thinking about writing a application like Xconfigurator using ncurses.
> What do you think?
>
Why?
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-dev
I was thinking about writing a application like Xconfigurator using ncurses.
What do you think?
---
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/re
Em Seg 02 Dez 2002 21:57, Peter Bowen escreveu:
> On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 17:02, Carlos wrote:
> > Why did you use dietlibc? Why did you not use glibc ?
>
> dietlibc, as the name suggests, is a lightweight libc. It generates
> noticibly smaller static executables that those linked against glibc.
>
Hi, I am trying to fnd out if (redhat 7.3) 2.4.18 kernel suports direct i/o
anyhow. I looked at the system call manpage and open() function does not
take O_DIRECT for direct/unbuffered/raw I/O as SGI does. Is Direct I/O
possible with a formatted filesystem? Thanks.
What is Redhat plans regarding SGI XFS filesystem support in RedHat
Linux. Do we have to want until 2..6.X or 'll Redhat include it in their
2.4.X kernel. Beside every other distos have this filesystem United
Linux and Debian.
___
Redhat-devel-list mai
Hi,
I'm creating makefile.lnx for my app(C++).
This what I did:
C_FLAGS = -O6
CC = g++
all: football
football: Football.o moc_Football.o Main.o
$(CC) -o $@ $+ -L$(QTDIR)/lib -lqt
-L$(AMZI_DIR)/lib $(C_FLAGS) -lamzi -lm -lstdc++
Football.o: Football.cpp Football.h LS.h Splash.h
