Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
By the way, you can use apt with RedHat. See:
http://apt.freshrpms.net
for packages and more links.
Thanks, I know. But I ask, "Why RH is not use APT?",
if APT is popular package managment tool and more flexible?
If APT has serious defects, I want to see it. Pl
By the way, you can use apt with RedHat. See:
http://apt.freshrpms.net
for packages and more links.
--
Joshua Daniel Franklin
Network Administrator
IOCC.COM
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Viktor Vislobokov wrote:
> Chris Tooley wrote:
> > Apt has some deficiencies in it's dependency resolution. It's re
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Viktor Vislobokov wrote:
> Chris Tooley wrote:
> > Apt has some deficiencies in it's dependency resolution. It's really
> > good, but up2date came along before apt4rpm and it doesn't require a
> > special repository to function, any ole ftp server will work.
>
>Ok. I hav
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:36:31 +0200 (EET), Panu Matilainen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 28 Oct 2002, Chris Tooley wrote:
>
>> Apt has some deficiencies in it's dependency resolution. It's really
>> good, but up2date came along before apt4rpm and it doesn't require a
>> special repository to func
On 28 Oct 2002, Chris Tooley wrote:
> Apt has some deficiencies in it's dependency resolution. It's really
> good, but up2date came along before apt4rpm and it doesn't require a
> special repository to function, any ole ftp server will work.
Uh. Up2date certainly does NOT work with "any ole ftp-
