Re: user and kernel space ?

2002-09-01 Thread Donald A. Dade
Hello, x86 actually has 4 protection levels that OS designers can play with, but Linux and every other UNIX, as far as I know, only use 0 (kernel) and 3 (user). The purpose is to disallow certain untrusted programs from performing certain dangerous operations without being somehow checked by

Re: rh-dev] Re: perl module version ordering differing from RPM

2002-09-01 Thread R P Herrold
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, John wrote: > I know, people have already said that. However, it yields > results that are clearly wrong. Nobody would think version > 0.001 was the same as version 0.1. ehh??? If I am doing development, using machine assisted numbering, and find versions with: 4.011 and

Re: perl module version ordering differing from RPM

2002-09-01 Thread John
On Monday 02 September 2002 12:07, Chip Turner wrote: > That's strictly opinion. The people (including non-Red Hat employees) > that work deeply with RPM daily don't really agree with your opinion. > > > RPM treats version components as integers, not floating point > numbers. That's the core o

Re: perl module version ordering differing from RPM

2002-09-01 Thread Chip Turner
John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Saturday 31 August 2002 23:10, Chip Turner wrote: > > > Try reporting that as a bug and see what the response is. > > > > But it isn't a bug. It's just how the algorithm works. > > A badly-chosen algorithm is still a bug. That's strictly opinion. The peo

Re: Not using Swap?

2002-09-01 Thread John
On Saturday 31 August 2002 21:09, P wrote: > It's interesting that I have the same observation on rh 7.3 ... whenever I've > observed my swap activity, it's always zero. But, your question about > executing "mkswap" implies that the user is supposed to do this ... I don't > understand that, s

Re: perl module version ordering differing from RPM

2002-09-01 Thread John
On Sunday 01 September 2002 14:32, Peter Bowen wrote: > So, no this isn't a bug, nor is it broken-by-design. If you can come up > with an algorithm that does a better job and is as fast as the current > one, please post it. The current one is a step above some of the other > algorithms available

Re: perl module version ordering differing from RPM

2002-09-01 Thread John
On Saturday 31 August 2002 23:10, Chip Turner wrote: > > Try reporting that as a bug and see what the response is. > > > > But it isn't a bug. It's just how the algorithm works. > > A badly-chosen algorithm is still a bug. -- Cheers John. Please, no off-list mail. You will fall foul o

user and kernel space ?

2002-09-01 Thread Mcen navaraj
hi, what is the use of two privilege level ? is there any performance is increase if we implement some program in the kernel space ? in linux please tell me in which space ( user or kernel ) the X11 is implemented ? why i am asking this question means if sometimes the system hangs , only the s