Salut Florin.
I have had those kind of prb... but, my solution is to use the rxvt
terminal. it's so nice and can endup with more than 4 terminals on your
screen at higher resolutions. and is so customizable and some nice
features I like and couldn't found them at the gnome's default terminal.
On Thu, 2002-07-18 at 06:45, Bob Tennent wrote:
>
> Putting :unscaled font directories first, followed by outline-font
> directories, followed by (scaling) bitmap font directories in the font
> path will improve rendering. I have no idea what comes out of the box
Speaking of that, i have a littl
>|>u> The real problem has not been the lack of AA but the pathetic fonts
>|>u> included with a lot of distros. ie Redhat 7.3 (and I'll never forgive
>|>u> them for this) had the worst fonts possible.
>|>
>|To my knowledge Red Hat used the same fonts everyone else used.
>|There quiality of
On Thu, 2002-07-18 at 06:45, Bob Tennent wrote:
> >|[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> >|> And the fix? All you had to do was reorder the font list in
> >|> XF86Config.
> >|
> >|
> >|
> >|Change from what to what different, and what kind of difference is that
> >|supposed to make?
>
> Putting :u
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 09:59:49AM -0500, Thomas Dodd wrote:
>
> Atul Sowani wrote:
>
> >A lot of people are indeed going for slackware 8.1!
> >
> What do Slackware doe for improving the fonts?
And what does "a lot of people" mean? Who? If this mass migration is
occuring over a minor system con
Atul Sowani wrote:
>A lot of people are indeed going for slackware 8.1!
>
>
What do Slackware doe for improving the fonts?
>On 17 Jul 2002 10:40 -0700, Florin Andrei wrote:
>
>u> I'm reading this article on OSNews:
>u>
>u> http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=1365
>u>
>u> One of the comme
>|[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>|> And the fix? All you had to do was reorder the font list in
>|> XF86Config.
>|
>|
>|
>|Change from what to what different, and what kind of difference is that
>|supposed to make?
Putting :unscaled font directories first, followed by outline-font
directories
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> And the fix? All you had to do was reorder the font list in
> XF86Config.
Change from what to what different, and what kind of difference is that
supposed to make?
AL
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTEC
Bingo! I could compile the code successfully for the first time!
Thank you very much Bill!
Another small query: I do get warnings "implicit declaration of
function `module_register_chrdev`" and for
`module_unregister_chrdev`. How do I avoid it?
Again, thanks Bill for your help!
Atul.
On Thu, 1
Sorry, thanks for the pointer.
- Original Message -
From: "Trond Eivind Glomsrød" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:03 PM
Subject: Re: Installing rpm's
> "Trevor Fraser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hello everyone.
> >
> > I've been using
Thanks Michael for the reply.
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Schwendt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:42 PM
Subject: Re: Installing rpm's
> On 2002-07-17, Trevor Fraser wrote:
>
> TF> I've been using RedHat for a while now, but a person
11 matches
Mail list logo