On 2002-04-30, John Summerfield wrote:
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
:> People also buy Red Hat Network entitlements that give them access to
:> updated rpms and isos.
:
:I get updated packages without having to pay for them. Specifically I had the
:recent sudo update (from amirror) before I saw the
Sorry for following up on my own post, but since I got no response I'm
compelled to ask: is this the wrong list for such questions? If it is,
what's the right one?
On Thursday 25-Apr, I wrote:
> Hello,
> is there a way to create process-shared mutexes in Red Hat Linux 7.* ?
> Currently, calling
Dear Hetz Ben Hamo,
Once you wrote about "Re: next release":
HBH> > Presumably he's one who hopes that Red Hat will eventually understand that
HBH> > its customers really do need to plan these things.
HBH>
HBH> And I would hope that maybe Red Hat will finally think about their business
HBH> pla
John Summerfield wrote:
>>--- Jure Pecar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>is there any ETA of the next release of RedHat? I
>>>know that 'when it's
>>>ready' is the best answer...
>>>
>>If you knew that was the best answer you were going to
>>get, then why ask?
>>
>>
>
>Presumably he's
Skipjack is beta:
1) It is downloaded from beta.redhat.com
2) When installing, the messages "Thank you for using RedHat beta software."
also verify this.
Guy
Kevin Waterson wrote:
>On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 12:23:34 +0300
>Paul Dorneanu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>was that a question, or you had
>
> > Presumably he's one who hopes that Red Hat will eventually understand that
> > its customers really do need to plan these things.
>
> And I would hope that maybe Red Hat will finally think about their business
> plan...
>
> Some how - with a ratio of 1000:10 (10 purchases for almost ever
> GPL allows RH to charge a fee for supplying the product. It
> doesn't HAVE to give
> it away, though I could buy a set and run them off (like
> Cheapbytes) or mount
> them on my ftp server for all to download.
It could charge a small fee for media costs [$2-$3/CD], but according to the
GNU GPL
> Check your facts. Microsoft doesn't sell support and most of the
> time they
> don't give support. They leave this one for your ISV, your computer
> manufacturer, to your IT team, or to a consulting company.
Yes they do... for larger companies anyway. For small businesses, Microsoft
doesn't wa
> > Considering the alternative (M$) who charges for the product and then
> > charges more for supporting, many corporation's CFO's are starting to see
> > the value in RH.
>
> Check your facts. Microsoft doesn't sell support and most of the time they
> don't give support. They leave this one f
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> People also buy Red Hat Network entitlements that give them access to
> updated rpms and isos.
I get updated packages without having to pay for them. Specifically I had the
recent sudo update (from amirror) before I saw the announcement.
How much sooner would I have
>
> > Support contracts are not that profitable (I know, I was in the
> business)..
>
> Ahem... Maybe you weren't a very good salesman. I think that RedHat is
> doing very well considering that they are giving away GPL product.
>
> Considering the alternative (M$) who charges for the product a
On Tuesday 30 April 2002 00:19, Trevor wrote:
> > Support contracts are not that profitable (I know, I was in the
>
> business)..
>
> Ahem... Maybe you weren't a very good salesman. I think that RedHat is
> doing very well considering that they are giving away GPL product.
I wasn't a salesman (I
People also buy Red Hat Network entitlements that give them access to
updated rpms and isos.
--- Vladimir
Vladimir G. Ivanovichttp://leonora.org/~vladimir
2770 Cowper St. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Palo Alto, CA 94306-2447
> Support contracts are not that profitable (I know, I was in the
business)..
Ahem... Maybe you weren't a very good salesman. I think that RedHat is
doing very well considering that they are giving away GPL product.
Considering the alternative (M$) who charges for the product and then
charges
> Presumably he's one who hopes that Red Hat will eventually understand that
> its customers really do need to plan these things.
And I would hope that maybe Red Hat will finally think about their business
plan...
Some how - with a ratio of 1000:10 (10 purchases for almost every 1000
downloads
>
> --- Jure Pecar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > is there any ETA of the next release of RedHat? I
> > know that 'when it's
> > ready' is the best answer...
>
> If you knew that was the best answer you were going to
> get, then why ask?
>
>
Presumably he's one who hopes that Red
>
>
>
> James Olin Oden wrote:
>
> ><- SNIP ->
>
> I like the man.config.d idea, but I think gnu-man has a solution already
> in place.
>
> In the man(1) page MANPATH_MAP and the NOAUTOPATH control the
> automatic construction of MANPATH.
>
> if NOAUTOPATH is not set in /etc/man.config then
James Olin Oden wrote:
><- SNIP ->
>
>>IMHO, best way I can think would be to enhance GNU man to
>>support include directory, like xinetd with /etc/xinetd.d,
>>logrotate with /etc/logrotate.d etc.
>>
>>Thus patch it use /etc/man.config.d if it already doesn't
>>and contrib to project :)
>>
I l
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, James Olin Oden wrote:
> > I was first thinking making these better configurable options,
> > but the package does not use recent autoconfigure, so I simply
> > made patches active by default. NOCONFIGD and NOGLOB can
> > consequtively disable the features if not desired.
> >
On Mon, 2002-04-29 at 06:52, Kevin Waterson wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 12:23:34 +0300
>
> A question. Many seem of the opinion that skipjack is indeed a beta of 7.3
> I was unaware it was a beta release. I was thinking it was, as you say,
> simply a 7.2.92 and 7.2.93 version.
>
> I have seen n
>
> I need to pass some parameters to a C prorgam, but in the form
>-i -o .
>
> There is another way than inspecting the String[] that comes
> as parameter in main ?
> If it is, please let me know, because i think it's better
> than my solution!! ;-))
>
Hi Javier,
try:
I need to pass some parameters to a C prorgam, but in the form
-i -o .
There is another way than inspecting the String[] that comes
as parameter in main ?
If it is, please let me know, because i think it's better
than my solution!! ;-))
Regards,
javier f.
__
>
> On Sat, 27 Apr 2002, Riku Meskanen wrote:
> >
> Ok, spent some more time on it and it config directory is
> now fully functional with relevant IMHO security checks etc.
>
Thanks Riku. I will download them today and try them out. Also,
as soon as I get a chance I will closely examine your pa
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 12:23:34 +0300
Paul Dorneanu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> was that a question, or you had a revelation?
> as the version says it is a 7.2.92 and 7.2.93 version
A question. Many seem of the opinion that skipjack is indeed a beta of 7.3
I was unaware it was a beta release. I wa
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Riku Meskanen wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Anybody out there get the same with std man command from rawhide?
>
> Or is it just me with 7.2 and upgraded man version from rawhide?
>
> [mesrik@tacit tmp]$ man --
> Segmentation fault
...
> Bugzilla or not?
Yes, it's in Bugzilla. I t
was that a question, or you had a revelation?
as the version says it is a 7.2.92 and 7.2.93 version
Kevin Waterson wrote:
>Is skipjack 7.3 beta
>
>kevin
>
>
>
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailma
Is skipjack 7.3 beta
kevin
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
27 matches
Mail list logo
