Emacs

2000-12-13 Thread Del Campo, Damian
Hi peoples, I'm new to using emacs on Linux, at Uni on the old Unix systems we used to use C^x and C^s (C^ = control) to save and then C^c C^c to compile. On the version on my Linux the C^x C^s works but the C^c C^c doesn't do anything and I cant find the hot key to compile (with or without comman

Re: errata glibc optimized for the 2.4 Linux kernel?

2000-12-13 Thread Bill Nottingham
Dax Kelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > In the preview directory on the 2nd RH7 cdrom, there is a kernel 2.4 > optimized RPM of glibc. Since the release of RH7.0, there have been a > couple errata updates of glibc. Can a kernel 2.4 optimized version of > glibc be created from the errata SRPM? W

Re: errata glibc optimized for the 2.4 Linux kernel?

2000-12-13 Thread Dax Kelson
Dax Kelson said once upon a time (Wed, 13 Dec 2000): > In the preview directory on the 2nd RH7 cdrom, there is a kernel 2.4 > optimized RPM of glibc. Since the release of RH7.0, there have been a > couple errata updates of glibc. Can a kernel 2.4 optimized version of > glibc be created from the

errata glibc optimized for the 2.4 Linux kernel?

2000-12-13 Thread Dax Kelson
This time with a subject... In the preview directory on the 2nd RH7 cdrom, there is a kernel 2.4 optimized RPM of glibc. Since the release of RH7.0, there have been a couple errata updates of glibc. Can a kernel 2.4 optimized version of glibc be created from the errata SRPM? What is the proc

(no subject)

2000-12-13 Thread Dax Kelson
In the preview directory on the 2nd RH7 cdrom, there is a kernel 2.4 optimized RPM of glibc. Since the release of RH7.0, there have been a couple errata updates of glibc. Can a kernel 2.4 optimized version of glibc be created from the errata SRPM? What is the procedure? This is the note from