On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, John Summerfield wrote:
>> >hi ,
>> >I would like to know what is the page size in RH Linux 6.2 by default, also
>> >in which header is it defined . If anyone has idea about the page size on
>> >HP-UX11 kindly let me know.
>>
>> That is architecture dependant. In ia32 it
hi,
Thanks for the reply the question is about the Memory page size..
Yogi
Software Engineer
Dcm Technologies
-Original Message-
From: John Summerfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 11:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Page Size
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2
Tony Nugent wrote:
> Geez, it must have come across that I don't know what I'm doing. :)
Sorry, the use of hosts made me think it was a beginner question. Having
seen your name so many times I should have known better...
> However, I am having to deal with weird situations where DNS might
> be u
> Sure thing. My visualization of what was being attempted is
> likely different from what is really happening. An ASCII art
> diagram would be in order I think to avoid confusion.
>
> I envisioned:
>
> YOUR_LANYOURFIREWALLYOURISP
> |
>
>
> Geez, it must have come across that I don't know what I'm doing. :)
>
Some of the answers gave be a bit of a chuckle.
However, to be fair, when people have problems it's because they don't know
what they're doing.
___
Redhat-devel-list
On Wed Oct 18 2000 at 09:55, Matt Fahrner wrote:
> The answer is if you've got multiple hosts and nets you should be using
> DNS. It isn't *that* complicated to set up (especially if you buy the
> O'Reilly DNS book) and you won't regret the extra effort afterwords. In
> the amount of time it took
On Wed Oct 18 2000 at 14:39, Mark Cooke wrote:
> Put 'multi on' in /etc/host.conf with Redhat 7.0, and the *updated*
> glibc. The stock 7.0 glibs segv's in the resolver if you have
> multi on set with multiple reverse mappings.
Brilliant! Thanks. Yes, this is the answer I have been looking fo
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, John Summerfield wrote:
>> run stuff like routed/gated. You can't just plop 3 NIC's in a
>> machine, turn it on, and use all three interfaces from wherever.
>> You need routing protocols running. And a nameserver is a good
>> idea too. ;o)
>
>Why, Mike, do I need to run
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, John Summerfield wrote:
>> >os2.ami.com.au is my computer; it's permanently attached to the Internet. it
>>
>> >also has an alias, www2.ami.com.au.
>> >
>> >I also use the name os2.ami.com.au for the domain name of my home LAN. Excep
>> t
>> >for one or two glitches, it wo
We have a LAN/WAN with over 5000 nodes and I haven't yet seen a
situation where DNS couldn't be used in preference to "/etc/hosts". The
only times I can think of we've used it are for temporary hacks and
bootstraps. Can you give an exact example of where you need hosts?
-
On Wed Oct 18 2000 at 11:59, John Summerfield wrote:
> > What I need to know is: if and how it is possible to somehow have a
> > (local) dns lookup that uses /etc/hosts to properly handle hostnames
> > that have two IP addresses (ie, multi-homed boxes).
>
> dns does not use /etc/hosts.
I know -
>
> Sounds like a routing problem to me. Multihomed boxes need to
> run stuff like routed/gated. You can't just plop 3 NIC's in a
> machine, turn it on, and use all three interfaces from wherever.
> You need routing protocols running. And a nameserver is a good
> idea too. ;o)
Why, Mike,
> On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, John Summerfield wrote:
>
> >os2.ami.com.au is my computer; it's permanently attached to the Internet. it
>
> >also has an alias, www2.ami.com.au.
> >
> >I also use the name os2.ami.com.au for the domain name of my home LAN. Excep
> t
> >for one or two glitches, it works
The answer is if you've got multiple hosts and nets you should be using
DNS. It isn't *that* complicated to set up (especially if you buy the
O'Reilly DNS book) and you won't regret the extra effort afterwords. In
the amount of time it took to write the message you could have set your
DNS up and c
On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Tony Nugent wrote:
> >Ok, this works very well for single-homed boxes - one IP, one
> >hostname, one entry.
> >
> >But NOT for multi-homed boxes (in this case, servers) which have
> >interfaces into two different subnets (and the
On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Tony Nugent wrote:
>What I need to know is: if and how it is possible to somehow have a
>(local) dns lookup that uses /etc/hosts to properly handle hostnames
>that have two IP addresses (ie, multi-homed boxes).
DNS has nothing to do with /etc/hosts.
>Background:
>
>The sim
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, John Summerfield wrote:
>os2.ami.com.au is my computer; it's permanently attached to the Internet. it
>also has an alias, www2.ami.com.au.
>
>I also use the name os2.ami.com.au for the domain name of my home LAN. Except
>for one or two glitches, it works well.
Is os2.ami.c
On Tue, 17 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 10:46:49 +1100
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Subject: respin ISO changes
>
>Our Local Linux User group is currently full
>of misinformation as to what/why the respin
19 matches
Mail list logo
