On Mon, 02 Oct 2000, Svante Signell wrote:
> Now when RH7.0 is out, are there any plans to update rawhide? The
> latest release is from August 11.
My guess is that the Red Hat distribution developers are taking a
well-deserved rest after working so hard on getting Guiness out the
door. However,
I finally finished downloading Red Hat Linux 7.0. I repartitioned my HD and did a
complete install.
During the installation one thing I noticed was that every time I pressed F1 it would
say the help for that was not available. Is that only because I was doing an FTP
install? I remember RHL 5.2
> Hi,
>
> I think /etc/aliases should be independent from sendmail. There is
> many software using. Please consider moving it out of the sendmail
> RPM and making it standalone.
It's part of sendmail; it's a standard sendmail configuration file. The only
change should be to put it in the new s
Welcome
RH 7.0, using egsc (kgcc), bind-8.2.3_T6B
kgcc -D_GNU_SOURCE -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti
-pipe -s -mcpu=pentiumpro -march=pentiumpro -ffast-math -mieee-fp
-fexpensive-optimizations -fexceptions -o nslookup main.o getinfo.o
debug.o send.o skip.o list.o subr.o com
Just rebooted RH6.2 to receive the following error message:
Kernel panic: Attempted to kill the idle the task!
In swapper task - not syncing
Can anyone help??
Best regards, Brian
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman
Now when RH7.0 is out, are there any plans to update rawhide? The
latest release is from August 11.
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
Hi,
When building kernel from the SRPM (stock RH7) the build fails, see
below... This happens both on a clean install of RH7.0 and on a
box upgraded from 6.2->7.0. Am I missing something obvious here (yes I'm
using kgcc) or should I report this to bugzilla?
- Panu -
-
...
Instal
conversion of a denorm float -> double is busted on the alpha.
from the attached program , the iteration at I=-126 fails to properly
convert the first denormal float number into a corresponding double
( the double is not denormal ). The exponent for the double should have
been 896 ( 1 less th