On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Frank Hale wrote:
>Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2000 22:55:46 -0400
>From: Frank Hale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Subject: boot process
>
>What src.rpm package is the message "Welcome to Red Hat linux" in?
>This message is d
What src.rpm package is the message "Welcome to Red Hat linux" in?
This message is displayed during the boot process.
Thanks,
Frank
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
> If I wanted to change the usage of /usr/src/redhat by RPM where would I
> change this?
/usr/lib/rpm/macros, or other rpm macro files, such as /etc/rpm/macros
or ~/.rpmmacros.
Bob T.
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://l
Anyone care to hand me the secret decoder ring and magic
handshake to turn:
/usr/doc/newt-devel-0.50.8/tutorial.sgml
into:
/usr/doc/newt-devel-0.50.8/tutorial.txt
or:
/usr/doc/newt-devel-0.50.8/tutorial.html
;o)
Reading raw sgml is like reading /boot/zImage to understand the
kernel source c
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Frank Hale wrote:
>If I wanted to change the usage of /usr/src/redhat by RPM where would I
>change this? Is this hard coded in the RPM source code? I'd like to do
>something like /usr/src/my_distribution_name_here.
Probably in the rpm-.src.rpm RPM. The rpm-build RPM crea
If I wanted to change the usage of /usr/src/redhat by RPM where would I
change this? Is this hard coded in the RPM source code? I'd like to do
something like /usr/src/my_distribution_name_here.
Thanks,
Frank
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL
> > >
> > > If RHI isn't using RPM 4, I sure wouldn't;-)
> > >
> >
> > So what would be your choice, if you were creating your own
> > distribution? Should I go with RPM 3.05?
>
> Go with RPM 4. Many of the new packages RPM 3.05 will *not* be able to
handle
> merely based on the version numbe
> I'm downloading the latest Gnome src.rpm packages from helixcode, I am
> going to build these and I want to replace the ones on the RH 6.2
> install disk with these. Should I expect any problems by doing this?
> Hopefully everything will work nice.
>
there should be no problem, just look the or
On Fri, 01 Sep 2000, you wrote:
> >
> > If RHI isn't using RPM 4, I sure wouldn't;-)
> >
>
> So what would be your choice, if you were creating your own
> distribution? Should I go with RPM 3.05?
Go with RPM 4. Many of the new packages RPM 3.05 will *not* be able to handle
merely based on the
unsuscribe
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
What is the reason behind excluding Afterstep window manager from Red Hat
7 beta?
I thought I could find it in Powertools but it's not there too, while
fvwm1 is there and fvwm2 is still in the main distribution...
--
Alexander
Homepage: http://www.sensi.org/~ak/
___
I'm downloading the latest Gnome src.rpm packages from helixcode, I am
going to build these and I want to replace the ones on the RH 6.2
install disk with these. Should I expect any problems by doing this?
Hopefully everything will work nice.
Thanks,
Frank
_
>
> If RHI isn't using RPM 4, I sure wouldn't;-)
>
So what would be your choice, if you were creating your own
distribution? Should I go with RPM 3.05?
Thanks,
Frank
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/m
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 07:15:36AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> > If I decide to upgrade to RPM 4 for my customized
> > distribution should I build all the RPMs again? Right
> > now they are built with RPM 3.04.
> >
>
> If RHI isn't using RPM 4, I sure wouldn't;-)
Pinstripe used RPM 4.0.
M
> If I decide to upgrade to RPM 4 for my customized
> distribution should I build all the RPMs again? Right
> now they are built with RPM 3.04.
>
If RHI isn't using RPM 4, I sure wouldn't;-)
It might be a useful test of RPM 4, but I'd not expect it to add anything to
your distribution. And, if
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> How to display PATH anytime instead of just a "$' in RedHat ksh? I remember
> PS1 and PWD should be used. But I can't get the exact expression of that. By
> the way, I can't find .profile under my home directory. Why?
>
I don't know
On Fri, 01 Sep 2000, you wrote:
> When I fork() inside a program, the PID of the child is
> incremented by two. Very odd. The system has zero activity on
> it, and I can repeatedly get the same result. The program works
> however, it just seems odd to me that the parent's PID is say
> 500, and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Dear All,
This is hardly a development question...
> How to display PATH anytime instead of just a "$' in RedHat ksh?
"man pdksh"
> I remember PS1 and PWD should be used. But I can't get the exact
> expression of that. By the way, I can't find .profile under my ho
Hello All,
I seem to vaguely remember some conversations about this in the past, but I
can't find anything. I have a question concerning the use of ddd (GDB) on
SMP systems.
If I set a breakpoint in my code, hit the breakpoint, look at a few locals
and then continue, 3 out of 4 times my targ
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> Any idea of how to do this? It is possible I suppose with a
> terminal window running su, or something but that is incredibly
> messy looking. I want it to look nice.
Run halt or reboot in X as normal user. You'll see nifty gtk window
asking for a pa
I'm packaging up a package that will have a GNOME icon placed on
the GNOME menu's. It *MUST* be run as root however, and I want
the GNOME launcher that fires it up to first "su" to root, or
some other mechanism. I'd prefer a nice GUI dialog box popup
that prompts for the root password, and then
When I fork() inside a program, the PID of the child is
incremented by two. Very odd. The system has zero activity on
it, and I can repeatedly get the same result. The program works
however, it just seems odd to me that the parent's PID is say
500, and an immediate fork() gives the child a PID
22 matches
Mail list logo
