*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 9/06/00 at 23:18 Alexandru Sofronie wrote:
>Hi!
>Please help me with a newbie discussion list about RH Linux!
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Look on Redhats site, under the communitty area somewhere there is the
redhat-list that is the general all versi
>
> [ speaking for myself here, not my employer and so on ... ]
>
> On Fri, 9 Jun 2000, JF Martinez wrote:
>
> > > I disagree about no "MTA worth his salt," and sendmail certainly DOES
> > > deliver mail to root.
> > >
> > > You can always create an alias yourself.
> > >
> >
> > I know it b
Hi,
I want to debug a linux device driver using "int 3" command. I was not able
to get any info on this. If any one can throw some light on this it would be
great.
Thanks
Samdeep
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
Hi!
Please help me with a newbie discussion list about RH Linux!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 03:42:40AM +0200, JF Martinez wrote:
> I know it but there will be people who don't know about it, forget
> it or perhaps one day a person at RedHat makes a mistake and my alias
> file is overwritten with a vanilla one where root is not aliased.
After any install or upgrad
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dave Ihnat)
> Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 08:28:39 -0500 (CDT)
>
> That's only partially true. The fact of the matter is that mail _will_
> go to root, and there's nothing wrong with that fact _per se_. I do
> NOT want someone else coding their idea of security into tools
>
> --YjUCIDG0UL7zSTfa
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Friday, June 09 2000, John Summerfield may have said:
>
> > > of getting a login shell for root. Logging in as root at a console
> > > (somethi
JF Martinez wrote:
> I know it but there will be people who don't know about it, forget
> it or perhaps one day a person at RedHat makes a mistake and my alias
> file is overwritten with a vanilla one where root is not aliased.
You _do_ have regular backups, don't you?
> Everything you do as ro
On Fri, 9 Jun 2000, John Summerfield wrote:
> I posted a harmless script here a while ago; however, mail.redhat.com
> wouldn't resolve about then & some mail bounced.
>
> I'm trying again;-) Just try click on the attachment and see what happens.
> Prudence suggests you peruse it first;-)
Noth
> It is not inherently insecure to have mail delivered to root, because
> first of all, it is just text. If I as root _decide_ to interpret it as a
> script (by using a stupid MUA), then that's _my_ fault, not sendmail's.
It is, of course, sensible to test your MUA.
I posted a harmless script h
[ speaking for myself here, not my employer and so on ... ]
On Fri, 9 Jun 2000, JF Martinez wrote:
> > I disagree about no "MTA worth his salt," and sendmail certainly DOES
> > deliver mail to root.
> >
> > You can always create an alias yourself.
> >
>
> I know it but there will be people w
>
> >
> > Someone noticed that kmail tries (and fails due to access rights) to
> > interpret scripts in mail and wondered about a Linux box being stopped
> > thanks to a scrpt beoing mailed to root. However no MTA worth his
> > salt (and that means sendmail isn't) would accept to send mail to
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
