JF Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> -pgcc not being the official gcc is far less well tested than gcc and
> has far less people behind it than gcc.
Also, to the best of my knowledge, optimizations which work in pgcc
will be incorporated into gcc.
--
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In
>
> > Before you go too far, why not
>
> Because people claim that pgcc isn't even stable. I wanted to get a
> bunch of fundamental code compiled under pgcc & then run it to see if I
> could break it.
>
> Eventually, what I plan to do is to allow several different
> architectures to be install
I think everyone's assumption was that you would not "write a telnet
program" but rather use a combination of fork and pipe to run
"/usr/bin/telnet" and then send/recieve commands/data to telnet though
the pipes you have open.
If I'm now reading this right you're saying that you actually want to
Hi,
My project is to write a C-Program that telnets
into a remote machine
(using fork and pipe). The parent process does all
the inputs such as
login, passwd, execute shell scripts ... and also
receive outputs from
the child.
Awhile back, someone sent me an example of two way
pipe that cr
> Before you go too far, why not
Because people claim that pgcc isn't even stable. I wanted to get a
bunch of fundamental code compiled under pgcc & then run it to see if I
could break it.
Eventually, what I plan to do is to allow several different
architectures to be installed on a machine, an
> > > > Mandrake's developpers claims using gcc2.95 and say it's make a big
> > > > difference.
> > >
> > > I figure it's worth a try :-)
> > >
> > > I got pgcc 2.95.3
> >
> > pgcc != gcc. pgcc has been known to produce bad code before, so I
> > wouldn't trust it too much.
>
> Yeah, but it's an
> Hi folks,
>
> Do you know of any Linux Virtual Server Cluster installations on a
> production environment?
>
> I need the hi-availability, but don't have any money. The LVS seems to be a
> good candidate... a cluster with 4/5 machines running proprietary software
> and oracle db's. I woul
