On Sun Apr 09 2000 at 13:49, Viri- wrote:
> Hey I'm just trying to shut down a few services that I don't want
> running on my system. I edited /etc/inetd.conf and got rid of most but
> my HTTP smtp sunrpc (?) and 6000 (X11) are still open. I'd like to
> make my system as secure as possible so
RedHat's handling of fonts is notoriously frail. It sets X to use a
font server. This assumes the system administrator is an experienced
person who does not make mistakes like stopping a "useless" font
server.
It would have been better to use a conventional directory based Font
Path and then s
> Hey I'm just trying to shut down a few services that I don't want
> running on my system. I edited /etc/inetd.conf and got rid of most but
> my HTTP smtp sunrpc (?) and 6000 (X11) are still open. I'd like to
> make my system as secure as possible so I'd like to close these. But
> where are t
"Spink, Gary R." wrote:
> ppp: dev_alloc_name failed (-23)
> ppp_alloc failed
You ran out of PPP devices? (guess)
I know the are created dynamically, but there may be an upper limit (like 256).
Check the kernel source.
--
Andrew E. Mileski - Software Engineer
REBEL.COM http://w
Viri- wrote:
> Hey I'm just trying to shut down a few services that I don't want
> running on my system. I edited /etc/inetd.conf and got rid of most but
> my HTTP smtp sunrpc (?) and 6000 (X11) are still open. I'd like to
> make my system as secure as possible so I'd like to close these. But
Viri- writes:
> Hey I'm just trying to shut down a few services that I don't want
> running on my system. I edited /etc/inetd.conf and got rid of most but
> my HTTP smtp sunrpc (?) and 6000 (X11) are still open. I'd like to
> make my system as secure as possible so I'd like to close these.
"Spink, Gary R." wrote:
> But I get the same result regardless of where I try to do the 101st
connect.
> Isn't every PID a separate process? If not, what constitutes a separate
> process?
"Mileski, Andrew E." wrote:
>Then you should be able to have N processes each with X connections, until
you
On Sun, Apr 09, 2000 at 01:49:14PM -0400, Viri- wrote:
> Hey I'm just trying to shut down a few services that I don't want
> running on my system. I edited /etc/inetd.conf and got rid of most but
> my HTTP smtp sunrpc (?) and 6000 (X11) are still open. I'd like to
> make my system as secure as
Did you hup inetd after the edit?
S
-Original Message-
From: Viri- [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, April 09, 2000 6:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gettign rid of...
Hey I'm just trying to shut down a few services that I don't want
running on my system. I edited /etc/inet
hi,
have you see this :
http://pages.infinit.net/lotus1/opendocs/book.htm
(or
http://packetstorm.securify.com/papers/unix/Securing-Optimizing-RH-Linux-1_2.pdf)
it's amazing and worth to read for everybody. may be most of them are known
(but I'm sure it contains some new info), it's a real big wor
Dear All
I'm trying to build a program that deals with network communications.
But I found a big problem now that is when I sending out packets I cann't receive
at the same time.
I tried to fork a child process who just send out packets and the parent process
just receve packets usi
JF Martinez wrote:
> This was my point: certification is not intrinsically bad. The
> problem is that some manufacturers have made a mockery of it. In fact
> we need a certification for certifiers. :-)
>
> --
Glad you mentioned that. Red Hat has that option as well. You can become
a Red Hat
hmm, the idea that certs are useless is something that I held myself for
quite awhile.
Now, looking at where I am now, I would not have gotten the job I have
without the certifications I do have. The problem seemed to me that
folks relied too heavily on certifications, either college or other.
13 matches
Mail list logo
