Oops I really gotta watch what I am doing. I forgot to
install pythod-devel, duh!!!
Sorry to bother everyone.
--- Frank Hale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >-- Simon Epsteyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > RTFS :) It's python.
> >
> > Included is a small shell script for running
> > anaconda in te
>-- Simon Epsteyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RTFS :) It's python.
>
> Included is a small shell script for running
> anaconda in test mode.
> It takes one argument -- location of the Red Hat
> distribution (the directory
> that contains RedHat)
>
> This is for 6.1 anaconda, may or may not work
> On a 486 _S_X? The scalable fonts must have been painful for a CPU
> without math coprocessor. It took over 1 minute in a 386DX 40 to
> parse them when X started.
You turn them off. Definitely. I also built a custom window mangler for it
Alan
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL
>
> > > In fact people with 16 Megs boxes will be unahappy. Even with 32 megs
> > > Gnome/kde are not so great when yoyu are using 6.2 beta.
> >
> > My daughter's using gnome on RHL 6.0 on a P133, 32 Mb and that's not
> > flash. Esp when she starts SO.
>
> If you use a sensible configuratio
JF Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That was wmconfig job: ensure menus were up to date.
Well, they never really were. Not much supported that method of WM
config and whenever you installed a new app, it wasn't in the list.
How many real fans of AnotherLevel are out there? I know I neve
> > In fact people with 16 Megs boxes will be unahappy. Even with 32 megs
> > Gnome/kde are not so great when yoyu are using 6.2 beta.
>
> My daughter's using gnome on RHL 6.0 on a P133, 32 Mb and that's not
> flash. Esp when she starts SO.
If you use a sensible configuration then both gnome
> >
> > On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> >
> > > The following packages and features are DEPRECATED, and may not
> > > be supported or included in future Red Hat Linux releases:
> > > - AnotherLevel
> >
> > Hmm, I guess fvwm2 users won't be quite happy with this...
> >
>
> In fac
>
> On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
> > The following packages and features are DEPRECATED, and may not
> > be supported or included in future Red Hat Linux releases:
> > - AnotherLevel
>
> Hmm, I guess fvwm2 users won't be quite happy with this...
>
In fact people with 16 Megs
> vs. kernel compiles to specific platforms like x86, cause eg. on Linux/PPC
> gcc-2.95.2 is the best compiler to choose for kernel compiles and I slowly get
> sick explaining users that your comments on gcc don't apply for us :-).
Try using gcc 2.95 and running some of the network cards on a PPC
> >
> > Anyone try out the free Borland C compiler in Linux yet? Good
> > ole bcc?
>
> Now it would be interesting if someone benchmarked code generated by
> Borland's compiler aginst code generated by Gcc. I suggest Nbench as
> a testing board.
I was just at http://www.borland.com/linux/ -
Is there a howto which describes how to make a boot
disk that would be suitable for using with a RedHat
install? I'm using RedHat 6.1 and I would like to be
able to make a custom boot disk using kernel 2.2.14.
Thanks,
Frank
=
ICQ: 7205161
http://sapphire.sourceforge.net - Another X11 Windo
>
> Anyone try out the free Borland C compiler in Linux yet? Good
> ole bcc?
>
> Let me know if you have, and if it compiles the kernel at all. I
> doubt it will though. The kernel has a lot of gccisms.
>
It will not. Since 1991 Linus has made clear that the kernel was
written having in mi
On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> The following packages and features are DEPRECATED, and may not
> be supported or included in future Red Hat Linux releases:
> - AnotherLevel
Hmm, I guess fvwm2 users won't be quite happy with this...
> - wmconfig
Has AfterStep learned to set up it
13 matches
Mail list logo
