Re: enlightenment

2000-02-23 Thread Kevin
although it is the truth, and the truth sometimes does hurt. -- To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null

enlightenment

2000-02-23 Thread Kevin Waterson
I was interested to note some criticisms coming from the e camp regarding the percieved tardiness of RedHat in updating packages. What moves are being made to get e up to date? Will E continue as part of the packages? I have included the piece from http://www.enlightenment.org/news.html Kevin

Re: here is my question

2000-02-23 Thread Andrew E. Mileski
Robin Cook wrote: > Tried that and it didn't work it still wanted libreadline.so.3 You must have the proper library installed before you do the rebuild. Installing a different lib will cause things to complain. Rebuild all the complainers after forcing the lib in. Been there. Done that. (same

modifying Anaconda

2000-02-23 Thread Frank Hale
What is the proper method of executing Anaconda for purpose of testing changes made to it? I've tried copying it from the redhat cd to my drive and running it but it does not run. I get error messages everytime. Also no documentation comes with it, is there somewhere I can find some? Thanks, Fra

Re: USB floppy

2000-02-23 Thread John Summerfield
If you want to try USB support, download the 2.2.43 kernel (neither of the next two build here) and inspect its documentation. Note the latest Changes doc is NOT included, but I think there's a web ref for it. If you like what you see, get the necessary upgrades (you can probably get them fro

USB floppy

2000-02-23 Thread Ivan Jager
Hi, I got a Sony Vaio PCG Z505SX computer, and loaded Red Hat Linux 6.1 (Cartman), kernel version 2.2.12-20 in it, but there seems to be a problem. The floppy drive is a USB device, it is o.k. when booting from the installation diskettes, but when everything finishes and tried to mount the fd0:

Re[2]: here is my question

2000-02-23 Thread Robin Cook
Hello John, Tried that and it didn't work it still wanted libreadline.so.3 Tuesday, February 22, 2000, 17:41:54, you wrote: >> guile-1.3-9, sawmill-0.24-3, and samba-2.0.6-8 all require libreadline.so.3 t >> o function, yet the readline-4.0-1 package contained in RawHide-2218 does >> not s

Re: fsck Errors

2000-02-23 Thread Alan Cox
> I see ext3, coda, reiserfs, gfs, but I don't know what is the "priority" > list (sorted by stableness, good design, features). The all solve different problems. GFS is a shared disk fs Reiserfs is designed for performance and to handle small files well and journalled ext3 is format com

Re: fsck Errors

2000-02-23 Thread Levente Farkas
Alan Cox wrote: > > but id does have enough to brag about. As it's proven technology (comes > > from AIX and is also used on OS/2) I expect the work to be done reasonably > > quickly. > > Work maybe, but its not proven until it works for a while under load under > Linux. That will take time. ext3

Re: fsck Errors

2000-02-23 Thread Alan Cox
> and IBM's porting its jfs to Linux; I don't know just how far along it is, ext3 works, tested on Linux > but id does have enough to brag about. As it's proven technology (comes > from AIX and is also used on OS/2) I expect the work to be done reasonably > quickly. Work maybe, but its not p

Re: here is my question

2000-02-23 Thread John Summerfield
> guile-1.3-9, sawmill-0.24-3, and samba-2.0.6-8 all require libreadline.so.3 t > o function, yet the readline-4.0-1 package contained in RawHide-2218 does > not satisfy these requirements. Should I just make a link for this library b > y hand or should I also install an earlier readline pack

Re: fsck Errors

2000-02-23 Thread John Summerfield
> > My question is how can I get around this manual intervention in the field. > > Should I replace the logic where "sulogin" gets called with my own logic? > > What is the best way to do this? There will be no keyboard attached to the > > system. > > #2. Get the ext3fs journalling beta and test i