Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> Yes. 7.0, probably.
Perhaps I do up a little script to convert bash1 to bash2
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
John Summerfield wrote:
> > On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, Kevin Waterson wrote:
> >
> > > Why is bash2 not the default for rh 6.1
> >
> > Compatibility issues.
> > bash 2.x is somewhat more strict about POSIX compliance, for example
> >
> > { ls }
> >
> > used to work in 1.x, but 2.x forces strict POSIX,
As a result of that bug, my database is now about 60 megs total so it would
be really nice if there was a way to cut it down again. Each time I did
a --rebuild, it would just append the new database to the old one so now I
have around 8 copies of all the rpms I have installed in the database. Is
Included is a patch which I believe correctly resolves the following
failure in the latest (yesterday or today) rpm-3.0.4-0.33 that is in
rawhide.
[root@narn rpm-3.0.4]# rpm -vv --rebuilddb
D: rebuilding database /var/lib/rpm into /var/lib/rpm
temporary database /var/lib/rpm already exists
D: cre
What version of RPM and rpm-python?
On Sun, Jan 30, 2000 at 08:58:14PM -0600, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Jan 2000, Matt Wilson wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jan 23, 2000 at 03:20:44PM -0600, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> > > Hrrm, it seems that having the 'root' set to "" was causing the problem.
>
On Sun, 23 Jan 2000, Matt Wilson wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2000 at 03:20:44PM -0600, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> > Hrrm, it seems that having the 'root' set to "" was causing the problem.
> > Chaning root="" to root="/" makes everything work.
>
> Yea - it needs to be a path.
>
> > When I finally d
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, Kevin Waterson wrote:
>
> > Why is bash2 not the default for rh 6.1
>
> Compatibility issues.
> bash 2.x is somewhat more strict about POSIX compliance, for example
>
> { ls }
>
> used to work in 1.x, but 2.x forces strict POSIX, so it has to be
>
> { ls; }
>
> Since a
Jeremy Katz wrote:
> [ Monday, January 31 2000 ] had Kevin Waterson saying:
>
> > Why is bash2 not the default for rh 6.1
> > Is there plans to implement this at a further date
>
> Past questions regarding this have come to the conclusion that bash2 is
> incompatible in several ways with bash 1.1
On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, Kevin Waterson wrote:
> Why is bash2 not the default for rh 6.1
Compatibility issues.
bash 2.x is somewhat more strict about POSIX compliance, for example
{ ls }
used to work in 1.x, but 2.x forces strict POSIX, so it has to be
{ ls; }
Since a lot of older shell scripts
[ Monday, January 31 2000 ] had Kevin Waterson saying:
> Why is bash2 not the default for rh 6.1
> Is there plans to implement this at a further date
Past questions regarding this have come to the conclusion that bash2 is
incompatible in several ways with bash 1.14, and that it would tend to
bre
Why is bash2 not the default for rh 6.1
Is there plans to implement this at a further date
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
11 matches
Mail list logo
