"James M. Rogers" wrote:
>
> Probably not,
>
> This would probably still violate some sort of patent that RSA has covering
> public key encrytion. Probably best to avoid for now til the RSA patent
> expires and some other companies successfully win a court case against RSA.
> Also it would ma
On Fri, 12 Nov 1999, Ingo Luetkebohle wrote:
> would it be possible for RedHat to distribute Apache with the patches from
> Apache+SSL or mod_ssl already included, and have just the SSL module as a
> drop-in, available from Replay? That way, one would not have to recompile
> Apache in order to get
Probably not,
This would probably still violate some sort of patent that RSA has covering
public key encrytion. Probably best to avoid for now til the RSA patent
expires and some other companies successfully win a court case against RSA.
Also it would make it difficult to export out of the US,
On Fri, 12 Nov 1999, Ingo Luetkebohle wrote:
> would it be possible for RedHat to distribute Apache with the patches from
> Apache+SSL or mod_ssl already included, and have just the SSL module as a
> drop-in, available from Replay? That way, one would not have to recompile
> Apache in order to get
Hoi,
would it be possible for RedHat to distribute Apache with the patches from
Apache+SSL or mod_ssl already included, and have just the SSL module as a
drop-in, available from Replay? That way, one would not have to recompile
Apache in order to get SSL.
---Ingo Luetkebohle / 21st Century Digit
Actually, San Diego has removed the need for the login program altogether. The pump
RPM will work out of the box in San Diego, so I'm told (I use ISC's version
instead). Phil's page @ "http://people.qualcomm.com/karn/rr/index.html" confirms
this.
David Fox wrote:
> Actually, that may only apply
