t;
>
> August
>
>
>
> *From:* RE-wrenches [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Jason Szumlanski
> *Sent:* Monday, September 29, 2014 11:54 AM
> *To:* RE-wrenches
> *Subject:* Re: [RE-wrenches] PV Array Definition and 690.47(D) (2008)
>
*To:* RE-wrenches
*Subject:* Re: [RE-wrenches] PV Array Definition and 690.47(D) (2008)
We are 100% on the same page. That is the technique we use and the argument
I make. In a large proportion of cases we have modules directly above the
existing premises grounding electrode, or otherwise where an
We are 100% on the same page. That is the technique we use and the argument
I make. In a large proportion of cases we have modules directly above the
existing premises grounding electrode, or otherwise where an additional
grounding electrode would be "as close as practicable" to a location within
6
Definitely could use some clarification. The 690 definition of an array
says "mechanically integrated", which sort of implies each roof plane is
its own array.
However in terms of actual PV design terminology, each PV system has
only one array which may consist of many subarrays. Even a 25 MW p
4 matches
Mail list logo
