hey are compensated for installing it.
Bill Dorsett
SunwrightS
1715 Leavenworth
Manhattan, KS 66502
Home/Office 785/539=1956
Cell 785/564-2583
wmdors...@sbcglobal.net
See Amory Lovins July 08 on Charlie Rose
http://www.charlierose.com/guests/amory-lovins
--- On* Sat, 1/16/10, Dan Fink/ /* wrote
From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org
[mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of
William Dorsett
Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 4:38 PM
To: RE-wrenches; Dan Fink
Subject:
85
_
From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org
[mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of William
Dorsett
Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 4:38 PM
To: RE-wrenches; Dan Fink
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] kW/MW v. kWh/MWh
But you know they keep talking abou
So one of our battery systems could be rated in terms of maximum instantaneous
discharge, lets see: 20,000 amps x 48 v is almost a full Mw..
Wow, now I can say I installed over 100 MwI like this new fuzzy
math..
It was such a bummer before to tell the customer looking at a ton of
: Dan Fink
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] kW/MW v. kWh/MWh
To: "RE-wrenches"
Date: Saturday, January 16, 2010, 8:51 PM
Hello Marco.
No d'oh!
Your assessment is correct; you can't store kilowatts of power, you *can* store
kilowatt hours of energy.
Author Lyn Corum might have sli
Hello Marco.
No d'oh!
Your assessment is correct; you can't store kilowatts of power, you
*can* store kilowatt hours of energy.
Author Lyn Corum might have slipped up a couple times in there and
dropped an 'h' from the kw, but maybe not -- because when storing energy
on a utility scale, the eng
great quanities of power,
in very short times. Therefore they talk of kW and MW instead of kWh and MWh.
A local facility which uses batteries is 10 MW and 1 MWh
Darryl
--- On Sat, 1/16/10, Marco Mangelsdorf wrote:
> From: Marco Mangelsdorf
> Subject: [RE-wrenches] kW/MW v. kWh/MWh
>
Marco,
You are right on with your observation. It is extremely frustrating
when "industry experts" in a technical industry use the wrong technical
terms.
rant ON
Another example; the improper use of "panel" when the intended meaning
is "module". Check 690.2 for the definitions. Just wait
I'm reading a piece on energy storage in the latest issue of Distributed
Energy mag.
The writer, Lyn Corum, repeatedly refers to the capacity of storage mediums
(thermal, compressed air, flywheel, battery) in kW and MW terms.
Heck, even my friends at Beacon Power refer to their flywheel sys
9 matches
Mail list logo
