Re: [RE-wrenches] Sanyo Semi-facial

2009-04-15 Thread Bill Brooks
ts.re-wrenches.org [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Geoff Greenfield Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 6:15 AM To: daryl solar Cc: RE-wrenches Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Sanyo Semi-facial My understanding of amorphous is that there is a 2-3 week burn in of higher performance, th

Re: [RE-wrenches] Sanyo Semi-facial

2009-04-15 Thread Geoff Greenfield
gt; if you overload up to 25% you will not have any significant annual loss. If > this is not correct please up date me. > DT > > > --- On Tue, 4/14/09, Bill Brooks wrote: > > > From: Bill Brooks > > Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Sanyo Semi-facial > > To: &quo

Re: [RE-wrenches] Sanyo Semi-facial

2009-04-15 Thread Darryl Thayer
, Bill Brooks wrote: > From: Bill Brooks > Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Sanyo Semi-facial > To: "'RE-wrenches'" > Date: Tuesday, April 14, 2009, 8:54 PM > Doug, > > That is why I made the comment that their panels tend to be > underrated (a > good an

Re: [RE-wrenches] Sanyo Semi-facial

2009-04-14 Thread Bill Brooks
Doug, That is why I made the comment that their panels tend to be underrated (a good and rare thing). One of the reasons is due to the article that Joel posted a link to earlier (the Japanese govt. hammered them for overrating). The product has not been on the market (or even in existence) long en