Re: [RE-wrenches] SW master & slave

2012-05-25 Thread Philip
:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Allan Sindelar > Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 7:47 AM > To: RE-wrenches > Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] SW master & slave > > Mac, > Unlike the later Outback, for which you designate a master, the SWs had no > way to do s

Re: [RE-wrenches] SW master & slave

2012-05-25 Thread Dana
AM To: RE-wrenches Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] SW master & slave Mac, Unlike the later Outback, for which you designate a master, the SWs had no way to do such designation. I think that when you boot them up (apply DC power), whichever unit receives power first becomes the master, and the

Re: [RE-wrenches] SW master & slave

2012-05-25 Thread Allan Sindelar
Mac, Unlike the later Outback, for which you designate a master, the SWs had no way to do such designation. I think that when you boot them up (apply DC power), whichever unit receives power first becomes the master, and the other becomes the slave. According to

Re: [RE-wrenches] SW master & slave

2012-05-25 Thread Roy Butler
Hi Mac, It's always the inverter that you powered up first. So you get to decide which one is the master. FYI- this can cause problems with customers that fiddle around with things and turn the inverters back on the wrong order.fun ;-) Roy Butler NAB

[RE-wrenches] SW master & slave

2012-05-25 Thread mac Lewis
Hello wrenches, I recently series stacked two SW 4024s. Everything seems to work fine. I want to follow the recommendation that the slave device is the generator controlling inverter. How do I tell which is the master and which is the slave? Thanks -- Mac Lewis * "Yo solo sé que no sé n