renches.org] On Behalf Of August Goers
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2013 3:40 PM
To: RE-wrenches
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Point of connection question
William,
You have 9 M190s each running at 800 mA according to spec sheet. That equals
7.2 A nominal output current. Plus you have 10 M250s
0 A solar breaker in this
case.
Best, August
*From:* re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org [mailto:
re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] *On Behalf Of *William Miller
*Sent:* Wednesday, October 09, 2013 3:07 PM
*To:* RE-wrenches
*Subject:* [RE-wrenches] Point of connection question
HI William;
I think you might have a problem. Looking at Enphase's ratings, the
M190 has an output rating of 800mA, while the M250 has an output rating
of 1.0 A. 10 M250s = 10 amps, 9 M190s = 7.2 amps
17.2 amps exceeds 80% of your 20 amp breaker.
I know this won't actually happen, but my und
Friends:
At the risk of asking a question that may have been asked and answered here
in the past, I wish to pose a question about Point of Connection.
Rather than outline the situation here I put it all on a web page. If any
of you have a moment to review this, I would be most appreciative
n to 5 or 10 amps.
> David Katz
>
> Sent from my HTC smartphone on the Now Network from Sprint!
>
>
> - Reply message -
> From: "John Berdner"
> To: "gseelho...@gmail.com" , "RE-wrenches"
>
> Subject: [RE-wrenches]
the Now Network from Sprint!
- Reply message -
From: "John Berdner"
To: "gseelho...@gmail.com" , "RE-wrenches"
Subject: [RE-wrenches] Point of Connection 705.12D2 Exception
Date: Mon, Dec 31, 2012 7:39 am
Greg:
Two part answer...
1) Yes, downsizing th
our new address.)
T: 510.498.3201 ext 747
M: 530.277.4894
-Original Message-
From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org
[mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Greg Seelhorst
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 6:49 AM
To: 'RE-wrenches'
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Po
Jeremy:
You are welcome, but credit belongs to Kent Osterberg.
wm
At 09:02 PM 12/30/2012, you wrote:
William,
They are using the 2011 code, so we should be good.
705.12D2 exception is a little confusing at first, but I got it.
Jeremy
Sent via BlackBerry. Sorry for typos and shorthand!
___
William,
They are using the 2011 code, so we should be good.
705.12D2 exception is a little confusing at first, but I got it.
Jeremy
Sent via BlackBerry. Sorry for typos and shorthand!
___
List sponsored by Home Power magazine
List Address: RE-wrenche
Jeremy:
Bingo! You have discovered the hard truth of grid tie with battery point
of connection compliance (GTWB POC). Your inverter will through-transfer
up to 60 Amps (A), so to use all of that capability, you should feed it
with 60A. However, you are not allowed to feed the inverter with
Kent:
I do not have that document handy at this moment. Can you send the
citation, please?
Thanks,
William Miller
At 04:56 PM 12/30/2012, you wrote:
If you are using the 2011 NEC, 705.12(D)(2) has an exception to the 120%
rule for inverters with energy storage to allow for operation of lo
If you are using the 2011 NEC, 705.12(D)(2) has an exception to the 120%
rule for inverters with energy storage to allow for operation of loads.
Kent Osterberg
Blue Mountain Solar, Inc.
www.bluemountainsolar.com
t: 541-568-4882
On 12/30/2012 4:27 PM, Jeremy Rodriguez- All Solar Inc. wrote:
I'm
I'm concerned that the inspector will not allow a 60A back fed breaker in the
200A main panel as it exceeds the 120% rule
Jeremy
Sent via BlackBerry. Sorry for typos and shorthand!
___
List sponsored by Home Power magazine
List Address: RE-wrenches@list
Solar
Sent via BlackBerry. Sorry for typos and shorthand!
-Original Message-
From: John Berdner
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 23:54:17
To: allso...@scswifi.net;
RE-wrenches
Subject: RE: [RE-wrenches] Point of Connection 705.12D2 Exception
Jeremy:
31.25 is the minimum allowable Ampacity (25 Amps
-wrenches
Subject: RE: [RE-wrenches] Point of Connection 705.12D2 Exception
Jeremy:
31.25 is the minimum allowable Ampacity (25 Amps continuous) so a 35 Amp
breaker would be the minimum size per Code.
The inverter may have a higher "pass through rating" to support the loads and
so is likely th
M: 530.277.4894
-Original Message-
From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org
[mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Jeremy
Rodriguez- All Solar Inc.
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2012 10:35 AM
To: re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
Subject: [RE-wrenches] Point of Conn
Wrenches,
Since the XW6048 calls for a 60A breaker to feed the inverter input and we are
connecting back to the load side of a 200A panel is this correct.
6000รท240=25X1.25=31.25A. We cannot exceed a 30A breaker? Help me understand
this.
Jeremy
All Solar
Sent via BlackBerry. Sorry for typos and
ga...@gmail.com
_
From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org
[mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Keith Cronin
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 2:41 PM
To: RE-Wrenches
Subject: [RE-wrenches] Point of connection
Hello
With the growth of the solar indus
Keith:
No matter how you slice it, every breaker panel and every conductor in the
feeder from the inverter to the meter must meet the 120% rule. You can not
dedicate one panel as an "AC Combiner" and exceed the 120% rating on that
panel only. It does not matter if the source is one inverter
Hello
With the growth of the solar industry coupled with the generous incentives now
offered on fed part of the equation, we are seeing some trends here and
wondering what the approach has been in other areas. What kind of feedback are
you receiving from the AHJ?
There are some integrators who
20 matches
Mail list logo
