Feb 12, 2009, at 6:24 A
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 06:13:42 -0700
From: "Allan Sindelar"
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] FW: Panel Fire
To: "'David Brearley'"
Cc: 'RE-wrenches'
Message-ID: <349d57cd55fc40f7ad67838bd66da...@allanlaptop>
Content-Type: t
David,
OK, you're right. Each row is two panels, not four, and one two-panel
subarray burned. My mistake, sorry.
I have a strong defensive radar about substandard work in our industry, and
this is an extreme example of what can happen. This can hurt us all in terms
of public perceptions about PV.
, February 11, 2009 11:57 PM
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] FW: Panel Fire
each 250 W < mystery module >___
List sponsored by Home Power magazine
List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wr
Allan, there are 4 modules pictured in the ³before² photo, not 8. The after
photo show the ³good² modules, the ones that did not burn. This suggests
there are 4 module each on two separate roof faces. Please have another look
at the before picture and count the frames. In the before picture each 25
I guess I'm not the only one who's suspicious of this whole story. This came
to me off list. Some of the post here doesn't jive - it's pretty clear
there's no glass, and the blurry corner doesn't look it to me.
-Original Message-
From:
I may be very wrong here and I don't mean to impu
5 matches
Mail list logo
