Re: [RE-wrenches] Code reviewer issue with array disconnect location

2011-11-21 Thread Ray Walters
Hi Jeff; The new combiner boxes from Midnite are interesting for this application too, as they offer a single external disconnect built into the side of each combiner box. They can later be easily upgraded with Midnite's new arc fault protection and remote disconnect. One simple signal switch

Re: [RE-wrenches] Code reviewer issue with array disconnect location

2011-11-21 Thread Jeff Yago
Thanks to all who replied with code references. I think we have put up a good argument and refuse to re-locate the five separate combiner boxes down at eye level on the top parking area of a student parking deck. Just an accident waiting to happen. However, in researching this issue I noted that

Re: [RE-wrenches] Code reviewer issue with array disconnect location

2011-11-18 Thread James Rudolph
Jeff, We have had some issues with this also .maybe try this ref from the 2011 code 690.16 (b) where the disconnect is located more than 1.8 m (6ft) from the overcurrent device, a directory showing the location of each disconnect shall be installed at the overcurrent device location On Thu, N

Re: [RE-wrenches] Code reviewer issue with array disconnect location

2011-11-17 Thread Jason Szumlanski
hes.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Mayfield Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 3:41 PM To: 'RE-wrenches' Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Code reviewer issue with array disconnect location Jeff, Try pointing them to 690.14(B). This allows for PV source circuit isolating switches on the PV side of the

Re: [RE-wrenches] Code reviewer issue with array disconnect location

2011-11-17 Thread Ryan Mayfield
Jeff, Try pointing them to 690.14(B). This allows for PV source circuit isolating switches on the PV side of the disconnecting means. As you describe it, the dc disconnect at the inverter is the required PV disconnecting means and you can describe the combiner disconnects as source circuit isolat