V is installed on structures that don't already
>> have and electrode system such as a separate building, garage, etc.
>>
>> August
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: RE-wrenches [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On
>> Behalf Of ma...@ber
Lic 773985
millersolar.com
805-438-5600
-Original Message-
From: RE-wrenches [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On
Behalf Of ma...@berkeleysolar.com
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 10:24 AM
To: re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
Subject: [RE-wrenches] 690.47(D)
Folks,
NEC
m
>
>
> Lic 773985
> millersolar.com
> 805-438-5600
>
> -Original Message-
> From: RE-wrenches [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On
> Behalf Of ma...@berkeleysolar.com
> Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 10:24 AM
> To: re-wrenches@lists.re-wrench
ma...@berkeleysolar.com
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 10:24 AM
To: re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
Subject: [RE-wrenches] 690.47(D)
Folks,
NEC 2014 is in effect in California. I just pulled a permit for a
residential system and it had a little stamp that had 690.47(D) circled as
a requirement
FYI, this has changed to more of a permissive rule in the 2017 NEC, than the
mandatory one in 2014.
-Original Message-
From: "August Goers"
Sent: 1/30/2017 13:47
To: "RE-wrenches"
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] 690.47(D)
Hi Mark,
The current issue of IAEI mag
.org] On
> Behalf Of ma...@berkeleysolar.com
> Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 10:24 AM
> To: re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
> Subject: [RE-wrenches] 690.47(D)
>
> Folks,
>
> NEC 2014 is in effect in California. I just pulled a permit for a
> residential system and it
> have and electrode system such as a separate building, garage, etc.
>
> August
>
> -Original Message-
> From: RE-wrenches [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On
> Behalf Of ma...@berkeleysolar.com
> Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 10:24 AM
> To: re
lto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On
Behalf Of ma...@berkeleysolar.com
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 10:24 AM
To: re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
Subject: [RE-wrenches] 690.47(D)
Folks,
NEC 2014 is in effect in California. I just pulled a permit for a
residential system and it had a little s
Folks,
NEC 2014 is in effect in California. I just pulled a permit for a
residential system and it had a little stamp that had 690.47(D) circled as
a requirement.
Anyone worked with AHJ's in California who are now requiring this? I am
planning to not install the electrode, siting Exception 2 and
...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Keith Cronin
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 10:05 PM
To: RE-wrenches
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] 690.47
Marv
Couple your comments with a delay in adoption of certain years of the code,
by jurisdiction. For example, the city and county of Honolulu have yet
Much of the confusion seems to be from the older versions of the
code. I actually find the 08 version to be less confusing overall (I
do have my issues though). It allows the WEEB system for instance,
which greatly speeds installations, and allows the array support
structure to be used as t
..
It seems here, even on this island, there are inspectors that are unclear
themselves, as to how to approach a host of topics, and grounding is one of
them.
From: Marv Dargatz
To: RE-wrenches
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 1:15:57 PM
Subject: Re: [RE-
Keith,
The whole grounding issue has been very contentious, confounding, and
confusing. The introduction of the changes with the 2008 NEC seems to
have complicated things further.
Also, just a general comment; in general (there will be exceptions for
larger systems, depending on electrical c
Hello
A discussion came up today about 690.47(C)(1)+(2) in regards to using the
Enphase products and the applicability of needing a separate ground rod for the
DC?
Anyone get any feedback from their colleagues or inspectors regarding this and
how they approached this?
The discussion also swir
14 matches
Mail list logo
