Here is another
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/08/how-elon-musk-gambled-tesla-to-save-solarcity
> On Aug 25, 2019, at 3:37 PM, Dave Angelini Offgrid Solar
> wrote:
>
> It was a bad week for Tesla. Below are some links.
>
> https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Walmart-sues-Tesla-over-s
It was a bad week for Tesla. Below are some links.
https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Walmart-sues-Tesla-over-string-of-solar-panel-14364829.php
https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-walmarts-joint-statement-resolution-talks/
https://gizmodo.com/amazon-echoes-walmarts-claims-that-tesla-solar-panels-
I’ve seen some paperwork on something similar. It was tested with #14 wire,
which of course no one uses which makes it void.
Also who is now legally responsible if there is an issue?
I heard of a big US distributor who had a similar report done. 14 gauge wire.
After the fire, and all the la
I see that Canadian Solar has some official looking report from Chinese CSA
stating that the Amphenol connectors they use are tested as interchangeable
with MC-4… Haven’t been able to figure out what the piece of paper means, how
the testing was done, or how they certified it…
From: RE-wren
Several years ago I disassembled an Amphenol and a MC4 connectors to
find for myself what the difference was. It came down to the cross
section of the O-ring. One brand was smaller than the other. Also the
female component that the O-ring fit into was correspondingly different.
So in one assembl
Speaking of Tesla...
What with Walmart and (Amazon?) suing them for PV fires...
Can anyone here give a brief run down on the whole Amphenol UTX (?)
defective or cross-mated connector story?
Thanks,
Mark Frye
___
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
6 matches
Mail list logo