[RE-wrenches] Ibew is working to exclude C-46 contractor’s from installing Batteries.

As a C46 since 2011 I'll contend that though the license may have its origins in thermal, according to the CSLB the designation is for both thermal and PV, and that is reflected in the licensure exam (to be licensed as a C46 one must be familiar with PV). What one does in their profession, whether

Re: [RE-wrenches] Ibew is working to exclude C-46 contractor’s from installing Batteries.

I’ve never heard of C-10 or C-46. A quick google search seems to point to it only being a CA thing. Nothing like this happening in MN. Jesse Dahl NABCEP PV Installation Professional IBEW Local 292 - Electrician Electrical/Solar PV Instructor - HCC Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 23, 2018, at 8:

Re: [RE-wrenches] Ibew is working to exclude C-46 contractor’s from installing Batteries.

Jason, I’d like to read the .pdf you refer to if that would not violate a Non-Disclosure Agreement. I am on the California Solar & Storage Association (formerly CalSEIA) Storage Subcommittee. Regards, Peter T. Parrish SolarGnosis / California Solar Engineering 1107 Fair Oaks Ave. Ste. 351 Sout

Re: [RE-wrenches] Ibew is working to exclude C-46 contractor’s from installing Batteries.

I haven’t heard about this but I’ve been calling for it for decades. The C-46 started life as a solar thermal license. Still is. When PVs first hit the scene in the 80s, the CSLB, in it’s idiocy, decided that a solar panel was a solar panel and stuck it in that classification. To be fair, in tho

[RE-wrenches] Ibew is working to exclude C-46 contractor’s from installing Batteries.

Hi at this point I believe this is a California only issue, but I was contacted by CalSeia today and was asked to be involved in a discussion regarding a move where only a C-10 contractor can install a battery based system This was news to me but they sent me a pdf outlining the issue and I will