Jason,
Thanks for the preliminary failure analysis of the latest hurricane
damage. Do you have any photos which shows the bent mounting plates
for the micros? Wouldn't that be an indication of the force applied
before something gave up? Good call to get new micros when the leads
and their attachmen
Hurricanes wind create both suction up lift and direct pressure against the
glass frame wall of the module -- if a module is to be held securely it
must be attached 1/3 or 1/4 of the way from top to bottom by each of the
two rails . If modules are facing due South and the wind force comes from
the
I wonder if a third rail would have prevented many of these escapees.Not even
attached to the structure, just to every module.
GlennSent from my 'smart' phone so please excuse spelling and typographical
errors.
-- Original message--From: RayDate: Fri, Sep 15, 2017 9:43 AMTo:
re-wrenches@
5400pa I believe in all cases.
I don't see any evidence of flying debris causing damage at all so far.
Every damaged module that remained in place is explained by another module
hitting it.
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:38 PM, Ray wrote:
> What was the pressure rating for the modules that got su
What was the pressure rating for the modules that got sucked off the
racks? Also, is it possible that flying debris caused some of the
random location module failures?
Ray Walters
Remote Solar
On 9/14/17 1:53 PM, Jason Szumlanski wrote:
More early anecdotal data...
We are finding NO ancho
5 matches
Mail list logo
