I'll throw in a vote for keeping the display on the SMA inverters with a
similar level of info provided by the -22's and the -40's. It's right
there, reliable, simple though adequate info for both monitoring and
troubleshooting, it would be a great loss. Not everybody wants to be
"connected".
Hi john
Thanks for that tip
Interesting quandary.
New revs seem to work better, more stable for RE.
But yea they screwed up on the internal memory clear.
Can you clear that via RE?
Jay
Peltz power.
> On Dec 19, 2016, at 7:57 AM, Chris Schaefer wrote:
>
> John,
> What kind of environment
Chris,
They are in a heated basement so the cold isn't an issue. I'm heading
back over there this afternoon to replace the mate 3 and see if the
batteries have crashed again.
This is the 2nd time they have been drained dead so I'm sure that they
aren't in the best of health. I will remember to
William,
I would ditto your comment about customers who are not adept at
computer/network/web being left out by a decision to remove the built-in
display. Wireless and networked systems always add a layer of complexity
to the installation and commissioning of a system. Setting this stuff up
is t
John,
What kind of environment are the batteries in? Given that we have been
experiencing some extreme cold as you know will kill a battery quickly.
Christopher
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 9:49 AM, John Blittersdorf <
john.blittersd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Jay,
> Glad to know you have had good luck
Jay,
Glad to know you have had good luck with the mate 3. I am depending on
it and OpticsRE to monitor some remote sites. The mountaintop transmitter
site has worked flawlessly but the main problem is keeping the internet
connection up there that is transmitted from another mountaintop site. A
6 matches
Mail list logo
