On Wed, 2023-09-20 at 03:53 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 09:47:55PM +0200, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> > The header contains a comment that details why the functions
> > list_empty_rcu() and list_first_entry_rcu() don't exist. It
> > explains
The brief summary in the docstring for function list_next_or_null_rcu()
states that the function is supposed to provide the "first" member of a
list, whereas in truth it returns the next member.
Change the docstring so it describes what the function actually does.
Signed-off-by: Phili
t_first_or_null_rcu to be congruent
with that entire comment's style.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner
---
Hi!
I hope this helps.
I wasn't 100.00% sure if that's correct, but I thought asking is for
free 8-)
Regards,
P.
---
include/linux/rculist.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(
