Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/321] 6.1.107-rc1 review

On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 at 20:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.107 release. > There are 321 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Re

Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/341] 6.6.48-rc1 review

On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 at 20:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.48 release. > There are 341 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Res

next-20240822: rcu: Unless rcu_preempt kthread gets sufficient CPU time, OOM is now expected behavior.

The following kernel crash was noticed on arm64 Rock-pi 4b, Qcomm dragonboard 410c and 845c devices while booting / loading kernel modules on today's Linux next-20240822. First seen on next-20240822. Good: next-20240821 BAD: next-20240822 Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing We are

Re: [PATCH 6.9 000/197] 6.9.9-rc1 review

On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 at 14:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 02:00:17PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 at 08:41, Naresh Kamboju > > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 at 16:49, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > >

Re: [PATCH 6.9 000/197] 6.9.9-rc1 review

On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 at 08:41, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 at 16:49, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.9 release. > > There are 197 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >

Re: [PATCH 6.9 000/197] 6.9.9-rc1 review

On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 at 16:49, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.9 release. > There are 197 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Respo

arm-linux-gnueabihf-ld: kernel/rcu/update.o:update.c:(.text+0x1cc4): more undefined references to `__bad_cmpxchg' follow

The arm builds failed on Linux next with gcc-13 and clang-18. Config: arm imx_v6_v7_defconfig - failed Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Build log: - arm-linux-gnueabihf-ld: kernel/rcu/update.o: in function `rcu_trc_cmpxchg_need_qs': update.c:(.text+0x348): undefined reference to

Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/372] 6.1.64-rc1 review

On Sat, 25 Nov 2023 at 00:17, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.64 release. > There are 372 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Res

Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/530] 6.6.3-rc1 review

On Fri, 24 Nov 2023 at 23:34, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.3 release. > There are 530 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Resp

Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/183] 5.15.134-rc1 review

On Wed, 4 Oct 2023 at 23:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.134 release. > There are 183 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Re

arm64: Unable to handle kernel execute from non-executable memory at virtual address ffff8000834c13a0

[ my two cents ] While running LTP pty07 test cases on arm64 juno-r2 with Linux next-20230919 the following kernel crash was noticed. I have been noticing this issue intermittently on Juno-r2 for more than a month. Anyone have noticed this crash ? Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing [