Re: [RBW] Re: Tubesets: Rambouillet v Roadeo

2010-03-04 Thread Dustin Sharp
Does this mean that a Roadeo has at least an extra half a pound of overly stout tubing? Or does the weight savings on the Sachs frames come from other things? I mean, all those baroque touches on Riv lugs must weigh something, right? ;) > > a sachs cx frame weighs about 3.5 lbs. i get to see

Re: [RBW] Re: Tubesets: Rambouillet v Roadeo

2010-03-04 Thread nathan spindel
And for bonus points, does anyone have an idea of the thicknesses on my '90 RB-1? The brochure just says Ishiwata 022E quad-butted. I'm curious. :) -nathan On Mar 4, 2010, at 9:11 AM, reynoldslugs wrote: Thanks for finding that... 8/6/8 for the larger sizes makes sense. Now, for the last

Re: [RBW] Re: Tubesets: Rambouillet v Roadeo

2010-03-04 Thread Dustin Sharp
Didn't someone mention earlier that the tubes on the larger Roadeos are the same if not beefier than the Rambos? If so, I'm not sure why so much is being made of it being a light bike that isn't designed for any kind of a load whatsoever. > From: newenglandbike > Reply-To: > Date: Thu, 4 Mar

Re: [RBW] Re: Tubesets: Rambouillet v Roadeo

2010-03-04 Thread Horace
-- Forwarded message -- From: "gr...@rivbike.com" Date: Jul 9 2009, 1:21 pm Subject: Frame-Bike Plans (some) To: RBW Owners Bunch > Newlite Roadbike. TheROADEO<---final name, final spelling, thanks for all your input and don't take offense. > This is really Mark's bike, b