SE Conn, huh? I was most familiar with the SW part, but SE is pretty nice.
I have three Carradice bags, all longflaps: Lowsaddle, Nelson, and Camper.
I like them all, and the Camper is rather large, 24L, great for touring.
The Dill Pickle bags look well constructed, but as Bob Cook noted, the
big
I don't notice it with my medium Sackville. However, I do use a small
leather strap to secure it lightly to the rear rack. Just so it won't
shift as much.
Will also agree that the straps are less than perfect in colder weather.
But as my other bags all have leather straps and buckles, the Sackv
>From rivbike.com, on the Medium Saddlesack info page: Key thing here, the
big difference between this and the SaddleSack-Large: THIS ONE IS DESIGNED
TO ATTACH TO THE SEAT POST, LIKE MOST SADDLEBAGS. WITHOUT A RACK SUPPORT.
So if you absolutely don't ride with a rack and you want a biggish-ol'
The large and medium Sackville in my household both attach in the same way (to
saddle and rear rack).
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rbw-ow
The medium attaches to the saddle only. The large requires a rack for
support, because for a saddlebag, it's huge.
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 9:45 PM, 'hangtownmatt' via RBW Owners Bunch
wrote:
> I do not own a Sackville, but remember someone commenting here that the
> large has a different attachmen