Re: [RBW] Re: More details about the medium Sackville saddle bag

2014-09-08 Thread Shawn Granton
SE Conn, huh? I was most familiar with the SW part, but SE is pretty nice. I have three Carradice bags, all longflaps: Lowsaddle, Nelson, and Camper. I like them all, and the Camper is rather large, 24L, great for touring. The Dill Pickle bags look well constructed, but as Bob Cook noted, the big

Re: [RBW] Re: More details about the medium Sackville saddle bag

2014-09-07 Thread Eric Platt
I don't notice it with my medium Sackville. However, I do use a small leather strap to secure it lightly to the rear rack. Just so it won't shift as much. Will also agree that the straps are less than perfect in colder weather. But as my other bags all have leather straps and buckles, the Sackv

Re: [RBW] Re: More details about the medium Sackville saddle bag

2014-09-07 Thread Dave
>From rivbike.com, on the Medium Saddlesack info page: Key thing here, the big difference between this and the SaddleSack-Large: THIS ONE IS DESIGNED TO ATTACH TO THE SEAT POST, LIKE MOST SADDLEBAGS. WITHOUT A RACK SUPPORT. So if you absolutely don't ride with a rack and you want a biggish-ol'

Re: [RBW] Re: More details about the medium Sackville saddle bag

2014-09-07 Thread Tom Harrop
The large and medium Sackville in my household both attach in the same way (to saddle and rear rack). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-ow

Re: [RBW] Re: More details about the medium Sackville saddle bag

2014-09-06 Thread Anne Paulson
The medium attaches to the saddle only. The large requires a rack for support, because for a saddlebag, it's huge. On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 9:45 PM, 'hangtownmatt' via RBW Owners Bunch wrote: > I do not own a Sackville, but remember someone commenting here that the > large has a different attachmen