Re: [RBW] Re: Hunqageometry

2010-03-27 Thread CycloFiend
on 3/26/10 7:37 AM, JoelMatthews at joelmatth...@mac.com wrote: > Where were the Belriots painted? I understand they were nice looking > bikes. Never saw one in person though. Those were painted on site in Taiwan. The most common complaint (and there weren't a lot) was generally about the lug

Re: [RBW] Re: Hunqageometry

2010-03-25 Thread James Warren
I'm one person who likes the seat forward, and the 72 degree seat angles are probably too low for me. So on my Rivendells, I mount the Thomson seatpost when I can. I've found that on my Bridgestones and Trek, this isn't necessary, probably because their angles are 72.5 and 73 degrees. -Jim W.

Re: [RBW] Re: Hunqageometry

2010-03-25 Thread Seth Vidal
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Bill Connell wrote: > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:30 AM, happyriding wrote: >> Any chance you could be swayed by one lone voice:  no lug lining, >> please!   Subtle is better than garish.  Even two dark colors >> highlight the lug lines enough. > > > I'm generally

Re: [RBW] Re: Hunqageometry

2010-03-25 Thread Bill Connell
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:30 AM, happyriding wrote: > Any chance you could be swayed by one lone voice:  no lug lining, > please!   Subtle is better than garish.  Even two dark colors > highlight the lug lines enough. I'm generally anti-luglining myself, but i thought the photos of the prototyp