Re: [RBW] Re: Cycling computers

2013-05-02 Thread Steven Frederick
> > > >> >> ...Did try a wireless for a bit, but there are too many areas where I >> ride that have interference with the sensor >> > Yeah, I don't use them for that reason as well. But I do kind of miss the (false) triple digit maximum speeds though! -- You received this message because you

Re: [RBW] Re: Cycling computers

2013-04-29 Thread Robert F. Harrison
I agree...cadence was interesting for a bit, but once I discovered that my cadence is pretty consistent I didn't care when I broke the bit that measured it by accident. Indeed I've now managed to lose the entire Garmin gps unit (a few years old and not used much anyway but still). I use the ch

Re: [RBW] Re: Cycling computers

2013-04-29 Thread Eric Platt
I'm with Steve on this, no cadence for me, please. Had one when getting back into cycling and was just as happy to get rid of it when the bike was sold. The new wired Cateye Velo models are cheap, but they seem to work okay. My favorite was the Enduro series as it had a larger diameter wire whic

Re: [RBW] Re: Cycling computers

2013-04-29 Thread Steve Palincsar
On Sun, 2013-04-28 at 18:42 -0700, Fai Mao wrote: > I use and like the Cat-Eye Strata with cadence. I have both the wired > and wireless versions. I find the wired versions to be really reliably > but sometimes difficult to setup I seem to have a hard time getting > the magnets close enough for the

Re: [RBW] Re: Cycling computers

2013-04-29 Thread Steve Palincsar
On Sun, 2013-04-28 at 19:25 -0700, Michael wrote: > I like mileage and temperature to be features on my > cyclometer. > That way I can see how much temp extremes I can take for > reference. > Good to know so you don't psych yourself outta a ride just >