Re: [RBW] Quick question on the Cheviot

2014-06-06 Thread cyclotourist
Oh wow, the Cheviot has 55cm stays... didn't realize they were that long. I would definitely go w/ a Betty with 45cm stays. But I'm just some guy on the internet. Go call Riv and ask them what would be better for climbing off road, and discuss what tires you would be doing that with!!! Cheers, Da

Re: [RBW] Quick question on the Cheviot

2014-06-06 Thread cyclotourist
I would love to have a mountain-mixte! But would try to get one with shorter stays for the above-mentioned reasons (climbing, front end lofting). Luckily there happens to be one like that available: http://www.rivbike.com/product-p/f-foy.htm What could change that recommendation is if the Cheviot

Re: [RBW] Quick question on the Cheviot

2014-06-06 Thread Shoji Takahashi
Hi RJM: In my size (48cm), the Hunqapillar has the second longest chainstays of production Rivs at 46cm (designed for 26"/559BSD). The Cheviot in my size (55cm) looks to have ~55cm chainstays (designed for 650b). For my riding, the Hunqapillar and probably the Cheviot would be terrific. The Ri

Re: [RBW] Quick question on the Cheviot

2014-06-06 Thread RJM
I will have to take the chainstays into consideration; I didn't really think about them when I initially thought it would be a cool mountain bike. There is always the Hunqapillar, Bombadil (for $$$) or I could go custom mountain mixte if I wanted to go that route. I'm not a fan of the mountain

Re: [RBW] Quick question on the Cheviot

2014-06-06 Thread Deacon Patrick
The point at which you'd start slipping due to longer chain stays v. shorter ones is relatively steep/loose if you have knobby tires. Though certainly a theoretical factor, in the real world I doubt it is often a practical one. With abandon, Patrick On Friday, June 6, 2014 4:38:48 AM UTC-6, Ch

Re: [RBW] Quick question on the Cheviot

2014-06-06 Thread 'Chris Lampe 2' via RBW Owners Bunch
I've often read about how shorter chainstays helped MTB's climb but never really understood it until recently when I read something where it was explained that longer chainstays are further back from the rider's weight and therefore more likely to "slip" while climbing dirt and gravel while sho

Re: [RBW] Quick question on the Cheviot

2014-06-05 Thread BenG
Re MTB chain stay length: my 1990 MB-1 is much easier to pedal on long uphill trails than my 1987 Schwinn Sierra, and the Schwinn goes downhill like a rocket rail sled in comparison to the B'stone. Those two bikes are kind of at extremes of chainstay length - I think the MB-1 broke ground with

Re: [RBW] Quick question on the Cheviot

2014-06-05 Thread Bill Lindsay
FACT: The Cheviut and Appaloosa are both exceedingly difficult to wheelie. I am notably inept at popping wheelies, but I'm even more inept on those two bikes. Thank goodness there exist no photo or video records of me trying. It's sad. On Wednesday, June 4, 2014 5:38:58 PM UTC-7, Eric Dau

Re: [RBW] Quick question on the Cheviot

2014-06-04 Thread Eric Daume
The long chainstays will make it more difficult to loft the front wheel over logs, etc. Eric Dublin, OH bikingtoplay.blogspot.com On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 6:43 PM, JL wrote: > Wouldn't the extra long chainstays be prohibitive to riding anything too > technical? I have very little experience wit

Re: [RBW] Quick question on the Cheviot

2014-06-04 Thread JL
Wouldn't the extra long chainstays be prohibitive to riding anything too technical? I have very little experience with MTBs. Jason SF,CA > On Jun 4, 2014, at 7:02 AM, RJM wrote: > > It's a bit early for Riv to answer via email and this bike is on my mind. > Just wondering if anybody knows th