Blame Berto. They're his numbers.
--Eric
www.wheelsnorth.org
www.campyonly.com
On Nov 19, 2009, at 6:17 AM, Ron Farnsworth wrote:
> Bad math.
> If 96% efficient = 5.2 mph, then 90% efficient would be 4.875 mph,
> not 5.1 mph. And that's with worst case efficiency numbers for the
> chain set
Bad math.
If 96% efficient = 5.2 mph, then 90% efficient would be 4.875 mph, not 5.1 mph.
And that's with worst case efficiency numbers for the chain setup and best case
efficiency numbers for the IGH. Based on this, the other calculations are off
too.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
--- On Thu, 11/1
