On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 4:21 AM, Frederick, Steve
wrote:
> Cool, glad that's all cleared up!
>
> I sure wouldn't relable it--it's original as it sits, right?
It's not original, but I wouldn't relabel it as a Protovelo, because
the bicycle predates the invention of the Protovelo label, doesn't it?
Riv might even know the original colors, since they were able to find the
original invoice on it. Not that you couldn't pick your own, but it would be
interesting.
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Sean Whelan wrote:
> I believe that the folks in Walnut Creek will sell you the Decals and / or
>
I believe that the folks in Walnut Creek will sell you the Decals and / or
HeadBadge if you have the serial number / etc.
You could get it painted with your favorite current color scheme, and just have
a blast with it. I assume you got a deal on the frame, so investing in a nice
paint job (or e
Cool, glad that's all cleared up!
I sure wouldn't relable it--it's original as it sits, right? I'd keep it that
way...someday you'll be glad you did, I think. As will future scholars that
will write papers and delve deep into the history of the finest bicycles made
at the turn of the century.
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Taylor wrote:
> The mystery has been solved, I am the new owner.
>
> It's a 1995 Prototype frame built by Waterford, this info was received
> from the original owner and confirmed, with some corrections, by GP
> and co.
>
> Should be labeled "Protovelo" and I'm cur
